Profiles in Courage Defending Public Health: Anthony Fauci, MD

By: Brandon M. Macsata, CEO, ADAP Advocacy Association

"When you're involved in a race to stop a horrible disease, you always feel you're not doing things quickly enough." – Anthony Fauci, MD

Physician. Scientist. Researcher. Immunologist. Advisor. Husband. Father. And to millions of others... Luminary. Yet, standing at only five feet seven inches, Anthony Fauci, MD – who serves as this nation's Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Chief Medical Advisor to President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. – is larger than life with many of today's advocates working in public health. Dr. Fauci didn't enter his professional career seeking the headlines or interviews or fame, but two ongoing global pandemics sealed his fate. 

The intersection between the HIV/AIDS epidemic and the Covid-19 pandemic has become the new normal. Although one has sidetracked the progress that was being made on the other, there are undeniable nuances linking the two of them. The origin of the virus... slow initial governmental response... media-driven hyperbole... fearmongering Southern Republican Senators... hope-inspiring clinical trials... advent of the new medications/vaccines, and oh yeah... Anthony Fauci.

Maybe equally as important, Fauci survived four years of the Trump presidency. That in and of itself is significant considering the guy who lost the 2020 presidential election spent most of his tenure in office attacking science, undermining proven public health programs, and belittling (or firing) career public servants. Yet, it is hard to imagine the public health landscape during either crisis without Fauci's steady hand.

Photo Source: Jabin Botsford / The Washington Post via Getty Images

The HIV community's Old Guard has come to respect Fauci, in fact, despite a bumpy start back in the 1980s. The HIV community's New Generation credits Fauci for saving their lives, ironically, before many of them were even born. There are striking similarities between the two global pandemics. Forty years ago, one president said nothing, literally, as the Old Guard was forced to bury their friends, family, and neighbors. Body bags darkened the evening broadcast news. Back then, loud mouths and misinformation strangled the science. Last year, another president said absolutely crazy things (i.e., bleach, anyone?) as everyone witnessed the world turning upside-down. Again, not one evening news broadcast ended without images of the body bags. And yet again, loud mouths and misinformation strangled the science. Sadly both times, millions died...needlessly. Fortunately, then and now, people like Anthony Fauci were working in public service and dedicating their lives to public health.

National Geographic's latest project, "FAUCI: FROM THE FRONTLINES OF ONE PANDEMIC TO THE HEADLINES OF ANOTHER," dissects the calling to public service that has defined Fauci's career. The film turns the clock back to AIDS' darkest days, which Fauci reveals that he has post-traumatic stress syndrome from it. The unprecedented portrait of one of America’s most vital public servants also reveals Fauci's clairvoyance:

"I wrote an article in 1981 saying that if we think this disease is going to stay confined to a discreet group of people and it's not going to explode, we're kidding ourselves," Fauci said. "A major journal rejected it and said I was being too alarmist."[1]

Photo Source: Disney+

The documentary also provides a glimpse into how Fauci's commitment to science didn't ignore the concerns being expressed by the patient advocacy community. It features ACT UP's Peter Staley, who evolved from fierce foe to personal friend of the 50+ year public health official. Such relationships between activists and government yielded positive changes, including the future design of our clinical trials.

In fact, Mark S. King brilliantly captured the blissful dynamics of the Staley-Fauci friendship last year in his My Fabulous Disease blog, Peter Staley Just Unmasked Anthony Fauci and It Is Fabulous. "Staley, an icon of AIDS activism, must have done some awfully persuasive cajoling to convince his one-time nemesis to chat with him in such an unguarded way," King wrote at the time.[2]

What is probably the most striking take-away from the new National Geographic film, or even the aforementioned Staley interview, is the unlikeliness that strange bedfellows will emerge between Fauci and his present day critics over Covid-19. The sad truth is the right-wing media, namely FOX News and ONE America News, have vilified the man who has dedicated his life to saving the lives of others... including my own. The result is too many politicians have opted to put ambition-driven politics over their country.

Starting in the 1980s, AIDS defined a generation. Starting in 2020, Covid-19 nearly brought the world to its knees. Despite the challenges from both public health crises, Dr. Anthony Fauci has worked tirelessly to ensure neither one robbed us of even more of our family, friends, and neighbors. Fauci didn't do it for the famed Bobblehead or the catchy Hashtag (#fauciouchie). He did it for us!

[1] Fiore, Kristina (2021, October 5). New Fauci Documentary: 'You Don't Get Intimidated' — Anthony Fauci gets personal in new film, opens up about Trump admin and history repeating. MedPage Today. Retrieved online at https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/94864?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2021-10-06&eun=g1295317d0r&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Headlines%20Top%20Cat%20HeC%20%202021-10-06&utm_term=NL_Daily_DHE_dual-gmail-definition
[2] King, Mark S. (2020, September 26). Peter Staley Just Unmasked Anthony Fauci and It Is Fabulous. My Fabulous Disease. Retrieved online at https://marksking.com/my-fabulous-disease/peter-staley-just-unmasked-anthony-fauci-and-it-is-fabulous/

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.

HIV Advocacy Must Apply Denver Principles for Trans Communities

By: Jen Laws, Board Member, ADAP Advocacy Association, and HIV/transgender health advocate 

In July of this year, Terrance Higgins Trust issued a statement of unequivocal solidarity in support of rights for transgender people, representing the position of numerous HIV advocacy and service organizations located in the United Kingdom. The statement focuses on the health disparities transgender people face and the necessity to address these in order to meet public health goals of ending the HIV epidemic in the UK by 2030.

I often like to say, “integrity is the integration of stated values in action.” Over the last several years large, queer umbrella organizations have taken up the banner of both transgender advocacy and, more recently, HIV advocacy as pillars of their activities, rather than back burner issues. This mirrors certain advocacy from legacy HIV organizations and service entities taking up activities of transgender advocacy and community specific programming. Much of this shift can be attributed to a greater national spotlight on transgender people (often centered on bigoted policy moves from the previous administration) or because of any number of reports with newly released data finally being gathered on our population pointing toward extraordinary disparities requiring address. Numerous domestic HIV organizations have issued similar statements, mostly independently of one another, as that of the Terrance Higgins Trust.

As it turns out, all of this attention is quite profitable for advocacy and service organizations, regardless of their mission orientation (HIV or LGBTQ issues). Both public and private funders have issued notices of funding opportunities and grants focused on assessing and addressing the health needs of transgender people and extending cultural competency trainings for service providers. While these funds and their intended activities are absolutely necessary, they are a sore replacement for consistent, operations funding to by-for transgender and non-binary organizations – of which many would be greatly served by these funds and, likely, more affectual than offering funding to organizations with limited experience or token personnel.

Artwork provided by The Feminist Farmwife

That’s the problem, isn’t it? For a community of advocates and providers who have trumpeted the core values of the Denver Principles, HIV organizations have largely failed in integrating these principles in terms of advocacy and programming for transgender people. More importantly, these same organizations have few if any transgender or non-binary people in positions of program leadership or administration or on the boards of these organizations. Indeed, if we are to realize “nothing for us, without us” as critically necessary in order to adequately address the needs of a very diverse population of people living with HIV and AIDS, organizations seeking to represent our interests and meet our needs must include us in every stage of decision making – not just community advisory boards. 

Recently, Black AIDS Institute has provided an excellent example in ensuring leadership reflects the needs of combating the epidemic in appointing Ms. Toni Newman as interim chief executive officer. And funders should absolutely prioritize those organizations reflecting this value up and down their “food chain” including integration of these values in terms of compensation, plans of succession, hiring practices (ie. prioritizing lived experience over that of college experience), and human resource policies (including benefit designs – ie. if an organization does not ensure vocal training or comprehensive medical and pharmacy formularies in their benefit design, they are not “culturally competent” in their compensation offerings). In addition, funders should consider 5- and 10-year commitments of operations funding to by-for transgender and non-binary organizations equal to or exceeding that of shorter-term funding being offered to broader LGBTQ and HIV organizations.

Similarly, private funders – specifically foundations with massive granting power – should not prioritize funding larger, well-funded LGBTQ umbrella organizations based on their calls for HIV advocacy unless and until those organizations include partnership and shared funding to existing HIV organizations for these activities. 

Ultimately, lack of funders integrating the values behind the Denver Principles in their funding choices risks pushing out interests in advocacy wholesale. If those impassioned enough to take on these fights cannot pay their bills, feel respected for their expertise, see a path to promotion, and can realize their priorities in success through funder support, they will simply leave the field. Our funders should also readily recognize our interests intersect – our success is theirs – and, while some may argue the advocacy pipeline is broken, it can be fixed.

Lastly, coalition statements are more than welcomed. They signal an intention and frankly, we need more of them – across broader interest organizations. 

Integrity, like love, requires more than words. Integrity, like love, cannot exist in the absence of action. We need to see some integrity from HIV and umbrella queer organizations and funders.

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates. 

The Passing of Our Friend, Bill Arnold

By: Brandon M. Macsata, CEO, ADAP Advocacy Association 

Photo L - R: Bill Arnold, Brandon Macsata, Michael Pickering

At approximately 8:06 PM EST last evening, William "Bill" Arnold left this Earth as gracefully as he lived his life on it for his eighty-three years. 

Bill passed away peacefully in his home surrounded by Michael (his partner, seen above), Sally (his sister), Sue (his niece), and Lieden (his dog). It is truly a great loss for us, and our community, but at least Bill didn't suffer. Michael did get to share a nice moment with Bill in the morning watching the news while holding hands, as well as spending part of the day listening to Judy Collins. 

We will keep you updated as more details are shared by Michael about services for him.

In the meantime, we invite you to read the recent 2020 tribute written by Jeffrey R. Lewis: 

The Lion of Modern-Day HIV/AIDS Advocacy

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates. 

Veterans Linkage to Care: Perspectives on HIV, Viral Hep, Opioids & Mental Health

By: Jonathan J. Pena, MSW, Licensed Clinical Social Work Associate (LCSWA)

*** Reprinted with permission from the Community Access National Network (CANN) ***

Approximately 8 percent of the U.S. population are Veterans, numbering over 18 million Americans with most of them being males and older than nonveterans. But those demographics will change in the coming years, with significant increases in ranks among women and minorities (Schultz, 2017). As a society, we tend to view these men and women formerly in uniform as larger than life figures capable of overcoming almost any odds. The reality, however, is there are numerous ongoing public health challenges faced by Veterans in this country once discharged from the military – among them HIV, Hepatitis C, opioid dependence, and mental health conditions. As a society, don't we owe it to them to provide the most timely, appropriate linkages to care and treatment?

To view the full opinion piece, infographic and video, go to: https://www.hiv-hcv-watch.com/blog/veterans-linkage-to-care.

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.

Could the Tide be Turning on HIV Criminalization Laws in the United States?

By: Brandon M. Macsata, CEO, ADAP Advocacy Association

The ongoing Covid-19 pandemic has revealed a longstanding truth well-known to the public health community, but often ignored by elected so-called 'leaders' and the general public. That is, public health is grossly underfunded in the United States. The federal share of public health expenditures dropped from 45% to 15% over 50 years.[1] Yet, rather than making the needed investments to address societal problems, or untreated cognitive and mental disabilities, or unfavorable social determinants of health, we leverage the vast criminal justice system to 'fix' them. There is probably no better example than the criminalization of HIV/AIDS in this country, dating back to the AIDS hysteria perpetrated by the late, bigoted Senator Jesse Helms. But evidence suggests that the tide is turning on these criminalization laws.

According to the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC), 37 states have HIV criminalization laws, including HIV-specific exposure laws, general communicable disease exposure laws (which could include HIV), and/or sentence enhancement laws specific to HIV. As of 2020, there were only 11 states with no specific criminalization laws.[2]

Starting in the 1990s, advances in medicine and the advent of the antiretroviral (ARV) therapies revolutionized the fight against HIV/AIDS; now, they are having a positive impact (pun intended) in the fight against HIV criminalization laws. The driving force behind it is Undetectable = Untransmittable, or U=U. In other words, a person living with HIV who is on treatment and has an undetectable viral load cannot transmit HIV through sex. According to the Prevention Access Campaign, "The science is clear. People living with HIV can feel confident that if they have an undetectable viral load and take their medications as prescribed, they cannot pass on HIV to sexual partners."[3]

Since 2014, several states have modernized their HIV criminalization laws - including California, Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, and North Carolina. With respect to these five states, CDC states: "Changes include removing HIV prevention issues from the criminal code and including them under disease control regulations, requiring intent to transmit, actual HIV transmission, or providing defenses for taking measures to prevent transmission such as viral suppression or being noninfectious, condom use, and partner PrEP use."[4]

Photo Source: Prevention Access Campaign

U=U has changed the HIV criminalization paradigm, evidenced by three more states turning the tide on these outdated laws. Joining the chorus for change are Illinois, Missouri, and Nevada. The following news reports provide an excellent analysis on the driving force behind the changes in each state:

• Pritzker Signs Bill Making Illinois Second State To Repeal HIV Criminalization
• Missouri Loosens Laws Criminalizing HIV Transmission After 30 Years Of 'Faulty Assumptions'
• Nevada Just Struck Down Its Outdated, Discriminatory Laws Criminalizing HIV Transmission

What is notable about Illinois, it represents only the second state to completely repeal its HIV criminalization law, following Texas' repeal back in 1994. “The repeal of the HIV criminal law in Illinois is a tribute to the work of state activists and organizers that made it happen, and a welcome advancement in the broader work to repeal these discriminatory laws across the nation,” said Jada Hicks, The Center for HIV Law & Policy’s Supervising Attorney for Criminal Justice Initiatives.[5]

Photo Source: Fine Art America

The criminal justice system shouldn't be used as a public health tool, because that isn't what it is designed to do. Broadly, some disability advocacy groups seeking to transform the system want to eliminate the criminalization of public health issues. 

In fact, Joshua D. Blecher-Cohen makes the case about disability law and criminalization in The Yale Law Journal, "HIV-specific criminal laws violate the Americans with Disabilities Act’s (ADA) ban on discrimination by public entities." We agree. In fact, there is a strong argument that such criminalization laws not only violate the ADA, but also the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. 

HIV criminalization laws don't curb the transmission of sexual transmitted infections, but they do promote HIV-related stigma. HIV criminalization laws don't save money, because they actually put taxpayers on the hook for more costs from unnecessary incarceration. HIV criminalization laws don't protect people, yet they do increase the spread of misinformation. People living with HIV/AIDS deserve equal protection under the law! HIV-negative people deserve a more honest approach to public health! And the United States deserves better!

[1] Haseltine, William A (2020, October 21). Underfunding Public Health Harms Americans Beyond Covid-19. Forbes. Retrieved online at https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/10/21/underfunding-public-health-harms-americans-beyond-covid-19/?sh=76b194a9419c#:~:text=Public%20health%20is%20consistently%20underfunded%20and%20often%20viewed,shorter%20lives%2C%20especially%20among%20those%20in%20lower-income%20brackets.

[2] Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (2020, December 21). HIV and STD Criminalization Laws. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Retrieved online at https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/law/states/exposure.html.

[3] Prevention Access Campaign (2021, February). Undetectable = Untransmittable. Retrieved online at https://www.preventionaccess.org/undetectable.

[4] Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (2020, December 21). HIV and STD Criminalization Laws. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Retrieved online at https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/law/states/exposure.html.

[5] The Center for HIV Law and Policy (2021, July 28). Illinois Becomes Second State to Repeal HIV Criminalization Laws. Retrieved online at https://www.hivlawandpolicy.org/news/illinois-becomes-second-state-repeal-hiv-criminalization-laws. 

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.

#YourVaccineIsWaiting Public Awareness Campaign Targets Marginalized Groups Living with HIV/AIDS

By: Brandon M. Macsata, CEO, ADAP Advocacy Association

The ADAP Advocacy Association recently launched its public awareness campaign - 'Your Vaccine Is Waiting' - targeting marginalized groups living with HIV/AIDS on their need to get vaccinated against Covid-19. Designed to raise awareness, it came in response to learning that numerous segments of the HIV community were among those characterized as vaccine hesitant. The campaign includes four public service announcements, produced by Brandagement, LLC. 

According to the World Health Organization, HIV increases the risk for severe Covid-19 by six percent (6%) and the risk of dying of Covid-19 in the hospital by thirty percent (30%).[1] Yet, vaccine hesitancy among the HIV community remains a very real issue in the United States, as well as abroad in other countries.

#YourVaccineIsWaiting continues our organization's commitment to focusing on the intersection between these two ongoing epidemics. Earlier this year, we blogged about the importance of the immunocompromised getting vaccinated against Covid-19. Fast-forward to now, four amazing advocates living with HIV/AIDS were asked to share their personal perspectives on why getting the jab was important to them, but also for the marginalized groups they represent. 

Tez Anderson, a long-term survivor living with HIV, shares why he decided to get vaccinated against Covid-19. He resides in San Francisco, California. Tez’s message aims to help convince long-term survivors to get vaccinated and further protect themselves.

In urban cities with large LGBTQ communities, HIV and Covid-19 has presented dual challenges for older residents. Listen to his message to the long-term survivor community: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9Z0qiwoe00. 

Jen Laws, a transgender community organizer living with HIV, shares why he decided to get vaccinated against Covid-19. He resides in Slidell, Louisiana. Jen’s message aims to help convince the transgender community to get vaccinated and further protect themselves. 

According to the Williams Institute, among transgender people 25.9% report being in poor health, 32.2% have not seen a medical provider in the last year due to cost, and 34.6% expressed their gender identity could result in denial of quality care. Listen to his message to the transgender community: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8W_ZmVDxO74&t=259s.

Michelle Anderson, a community activist and policy associate living with HIV, shares why she decided to get vaccinated against Covid-19. She lives in Waxahachie, Texas. Michelle’s message aims to help convince African Americans to get vaccinated and further protect themselves.

In states with large urban communities, Covid-19 has disproportionately impacted African Americans. Listen to her message to the African American community: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AJ440_kE68&t=213s.

Jonathan J. Pena, MSW, licensed clinical social worker associate living with HIV, shares why he decided to get vaccinated against Covid-19. He lives in Morrisville, North Carolina.

There are over 250,000 Hispanic/Latino Americans living with HIV/AIDS in the United States. One in five new HIV diagnosis in the United States were among Hispanic/Latino men (22%). Listen to his message to the Hispanic/Latino community: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPWXIonBtTI&t=233s.

Why is our ongoing public awareness campaign important? According to research conducted by Johns Hopkins Medicine, Pfizer/BioNTech's vaccine induces a robust immune response in people living with HIV.[2] 

“Previous research has suggested a suboptimal response to COVID-19 vaccines in people living with HIV; however, these studies did not fully characterize and define that response, both for cellular [where the immune system directly attacks infected cells] and humoral [where the immune system circulates virus-fighting antibodies] immunity,” says study senior author Joel Blankson, M.D., Ph.D., professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. “What we found with the widely used Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was just the opposite, as it induces robust immune responses in people living with HIV comparable to those seen in healthy people.”[3]

The HIV community has waited decades for the development of a vaccine to defend against acquiring the human immunodeficiency virus, and yet we have one available for the other ongoing epidemic. SARS-CoV-2 has already taken 659,813 souls (and counting) from us in the United States, alone. Our community must meet the challenges presented by Covid-19 with the same intensity and rigor that we've done in the fight against HIV/AIDS over the last forty years. That is why, #YourVaccineIsWaiting.

[1] World Health Organization (2021, July 15). WHO warns that HIV infection increases risk of severe and critical COVID-19. Retrieved online at https://www.who.int/news/item/15-07-2021-who-warns-that-hiv-infection-increases-risk-of-severe-and-critical-covid-19.
[2] Johns Hopkines Medicine (2021, August 11). COVID-19 NEWS: Johns Hopkins Medicine Study Shows Vaccine Likely Protects People with HIV. Retrieved online at https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/newsroom/news-releases/covid-19-news-johns-hopkins-medicine-study-shows-vaccine-likely-protects-people-with-hiv.
[3] Johns Hopkines Medicine (2021, August 11). COVID-19 NEWS: Johns Hopkins Medicine Study Shows Vaccine Likely Protects People with HIV. Retrieved online at https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/newsroom/news-releases/covid-19-news-johns-hopkins-medicine-study-shows-vaccine-likely-protects-people-with-hiv.

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.

Deja Vu All Over Again: Counterfeit Biktarvy® & Descovy® Anti-HIV Medicines

By: Brandon M. Macsata, CEO, ADAP Advocacy Association

Baseball Hall-of-Fame legend Yogi Berra coined the infamous phrase, "It's deja vu all over again". For the HIV community, it finds itself once again confronting the sad reality that antiretroviral (ARV) therapy isn't immune from counterfeit and tampered medicines. The latest counterfeit warning - involving products manufactured by Gilead Sciences - represents the second such ARV-related counterfeit scheme in less than one year.

Earlier this year, we raised similar concerns over fake Symtuza® entering the U.S. drug supply chain. It came in response to Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson issuing a drug warning alert in late 2020 about the counterfeit HIV drug. There were no reported adverse events related to the use of the counterfeit product, but it nonetheless sounded the alarm over fake HIV medications potentially reaching medicine cabinets in American households.

Fast-forward to August 2021, Gilead Sciences alerted the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) that fake meds for its once-daily single tablet HIV treatment regimen Biktarvy® (bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg tablets) and its HIV treatment and prevention medication Descovy® (emtricitabine 200 mg and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg tablets) were within U.S. drug distribution networks.[1]

“The safety of individuals taking Gilead medication is always our first priority,” said Merdad Parsey, MD, PhD, Chief Medical Officer, Gilead Sciences. “We are taking aggressive action to ensure that healthcare providers and people who rely on our medicines can confidently distinguish authentic Gilead products from counterfeit drugs.”[2]

Photo Source: Gilead Sciences

According to Gilead Science, "counterfeit and tampered medicines can bring serious and sometimes life-threatening health risks to individuals." It is also important to note that these medicines are: 

• not the same as authentic medicine in terms quality, safety, and/or efficacy;
• not guaranteed to contain the correct drug or active ingredients;
• not likely to meet purity standards; and
• not inspected for unsafe manufacturing conditions or secure supply chains.[3]

Gilead Sciences' full statement is available online here: https://www.gilead.com/news-and-press/company-statements/gilead-warns-of-counterfeit-hiv-medication-being-distributed-in-the-united-states. 

Fortunately, it appears that there have been no reported adverse events related to the use of the counterfeit product. Advocates credit the U.S. drug supply chain's internal safety protocols.

Shabbir J. Safdar, Executive Director of the Partnership for Safe Medicines, summarized, "U.S. licensed pharmacies are the safest in the world. They're so safe we often go years without seeing a fake medication in the legitimate supply chain like this. But the consequences of a fake medication in a licensed pharmacy is serious and life threatening, given the numbers of patients that could be affected. We're grateful to see how fast both Gilead's security team and the FDA have responded."

Any patient who fears they may have received counterfeit Gilead medications should immediately report the medicine to their doctor and pharmacy and Gilead Product Quality Complaints at 1-800-445-3235 or QualityComplaints@gilead.com.

People living with HIV/AIDS, or any chronic condition, need to have confidence that they're getting a safe prescription medicine. The assurance in knowing that the product has been rigorously tested with a safety-seal as appropriate for treatment is vitally important for the patient advocacy community. Forty-years into the epidemic it is clear that drug manufacturers, government agencies, and patients must remain vigilant to combat threats to the nation's drug supply chain.

[1] Gilead Sciences (2021, August 5). Gilead Warns of Counterfeit HIV Medication Being Distributed in the United States. Retrieved online at https://www.gilead.com/news-and-press/company-statements/gilead-warns-of-counterfeit-hiv-medication-being-distributed-in-the-united-states.
[2] Gilead Sciences (2021, August 5). Gilead Warns of Counterfeit HIV Medication Being Distributed in the United States. Retrieved online at https://www.gilead.com/news-and-press/company-statements/gilead-warns-of-counterfeit-hiv-medication-being-distributed-in-the-united-states.
[3] Gilead Sciences (2021, August 5). Gilead Warns of Counterfeit HIV Medication Being Distributed in the United States. Retrieved online at https://www.gilead.com/news-and-press/company-statements/gilead-warns-of-counterfeit-hiv-medication-being-distributed-in-the-united-states.

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.