Showing posts with label Appalachian Learning Initiative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Appalachian Learning Initiative. Show all posts

Thursday, July 20, 2023

The State of Long-Acting Injectable Medicaid Coverage

By: Marcus J. Hopkins, ADAP Blog Guest Contributor, and Founder & Executive Director of the Appalachian Learning Initiative (APPLI)

A review of state Medicaid programs has revealed that coverage of recently approved Long-Acting Injectable (LAI) drugs used for the treatment of HIV is mixed, with several key states making access to these drugs difficult for patients. Currently, such products include Cabenuva (cabotegravir; rilpivirine| ViiV Healthcare), Sunlenca (lenacapavir | Gilead Sciences), and Trogarzo (ibalizumab | Theratechnologies).

Cabenuva received full approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2021 and is used to treat patients who have already proven to be adherent to daily pill regimens and have achieved undetectable viral suppression, meaning that they have fewer than 50 copies of the HIV virus per milliliter of blood. Cabenuva is a series of two injections (200mg cabotegravir; 200mg rilpivirine) administered to patients by a healthcare provider once every month or every other month.

Sunlenca is a salvage therapy—a treatment option utilized in patients who have multi-drug-resistant strains of HIV or who have experienced drug toxicity—that is administered twice a year and used in combination with other antiretroviral drugs.

Trogarzo is also a salvage therapy — a long-acting monoclonal antibody which binds to domain 2 of the CD4 T cell receptors. The drug is approved, in combination with other antiretrovirals, for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug resistant (MDR) HIV-1 infection failing their current antiretroviral regimen.

The FDA approval of LAIs presents Persons Living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) with one of the most exciting opportunities to ever occur in the HIV treatment landscape: the chance to remain undetectable without having to remember to stop every day to take your HIV medications. Cabenuva is specifically designed for patients who have a proven track record of medication adherence, and the prospect of having to treat your HIV only once every month or every other month is both appealing and revolutionary—a sea change in a treatment landscape that has all too often been beset by horrific, painful, disfiguring, and/or sickening side effects and short medication half-lives that placed patients at risk of developing multi-drug-resistant strains of HIV after missing even a single dose.

LAIs still face several barriers they must overcome before they become the first-line standard of care, including (but not limited to) provider and patient awareness and acceptance of the regimens, payor Prior Authorization limits, and the requirement that the drugs be administered by clinicians rather than by patients, themselves. The latter barrier makes prescribing LAIs in rural and remote areas a difficult proposition, as patients in those regions often face their own barriers to accessing care and treatment, including geographic, transportation, and financial barriers.

The new review of state Medicaid programs in the United States found that 38 states provide coverage for Cabenuva, of which 20 states list it as a Preferred Drug, 7 as a Non-Preferred Drug, and 13 have Prior Authorization requirements restricting access to the drug. 13 states Medicaid Programs—AR, CO, DE, GA, IN, IA, KS, KY, MT, NE, SC, TN, WI—offer either no coverage or list the drug as non-formulary (Figure 1).

Figure 1 – State Medicaid Preferred Drug List Coverage of Cabenuva, July 2023

State Medicaid Preferred Drug List Coverage of Cabenuva, July 2023

State Medicaid program coverage of Sunlenca is less robust, which is to be expected given that the drug only received FDA approval in January 2023. 30 states currently offer coverage for Sunlenca, of which 23 states list the drug as a Preferred Drug, 7 as a Non-Preferred Drug. 21 states offer either no coverage or list the drug as Non-Formulary (Figure 2).

Figure 2 – State Medicaid Preferred Drug List Coverage of Sunlenca, July 2023

State Medicaid Preferred Drug List Coverage of Sunlenca, July 2023

State Medicaid program coverage of Trogarzo is even less robust. 30 states currently offer coverage for Trogarzo, of which 22 states list the drug as a Preferred Drug and 8 as a Non-Preferred Drug. 21 states offer either no coverage or list the drug as Non-Formulary (Figure 3).

Figure 3 – State Medicaid Preferred Drug List Coverage of Trogarzo, July 2023

State Medicaid Preferred Drug List Coverage of Trogarzo, July 2023

Several states have restrictions against prescribing Cabenuva as a treatment regimen, including Delaware, which requires failure with two Preferred Agents before Prior Authorization requests will be approved, and Wisconsin, in which both Cabenuva and Sunlenca are considered “Non-Formulary” (Table 1).

This review of Medicaid PDL coverage was initiated after receiving a report from Positive Health Clinic in Morgantown, WV, that West Virginia’s state Medicaid program was denying virtually all prescriptions for Cabenuva. A Patient Care Navigator reported that West Virginia’s Medicaid program has essentially classified the drug as a salvage therapy through its Prior Authorization requirements.

To date, Positive Health Clinic has had all new prescriptions denied by the state’s Medical Director, even after multiple appeals and conversations with state Medicaid officials. Those appeals included copies of the FDA approval and treatment indication, highlighting that the state has misclassified the drug.

The one exception has been an approval as a result of medication continuation. A patient who moved to West Virginia from Pennsylvania and was already prescribed the regimen. In order to get their prescription approved, Positive Health Clinic had to submit multiple forms of proof that the patient was fit to continue therapy, including:

  1. An active prescription for the drug
  2. Evidence that the patient was 100% compliant with receiving each dose
  3. Proof that the patient would continue to remain compliant.

We reviewed West Virginia’s state Medicaid PDL and Cabenuva Prior Authorization form in order to confirm this report and found the following guidance:

Cabenuva requires review by the Medical Director and is available only on appeal. Medical reasoning beyond convenience or enhanced compliance over preferred agents must be provided.

This approval guidance exists in direct opposition to the FDA’s approval and treatment indication guidance:

CABENUVA, a 2-drug co-packaged product of cabotegravir, a human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI), and rilpivirine, an HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is indicated as a complete regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults to replace the current antiretroviral regimen in those who are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) on a stable antiretroviral regimen with no history of treatment failure and with no known or suspected resistance to either cabotegravir or rilpivirine.

While Prior Authorization requirements for new (and often expensive) therapeutic drugs are not uncommon, the West Virginia Medicaid program’s blanket preemptive denial of a highly effective and proven HIV therapy appears to be an attempt to staunch what they believe will be an influx of prescriptions for an expensive drug. This approach is likely a response to increased efforts on the part of HIV and Harm Reduction advocates to utilize Cabenuva as the go-to therapy in West Virginia’s hard-to-reach, hard-to-treat patient populations.

Since 2018, West Virginia has endured two concurrent, unrelated (according to molecular surveillance), and unabated HIV outbreaks in Cabell and Kanawha Counties. These outbreaks, for which the state has received very limited funds from federal agencies to combat, have occurred primarily in populations of Persons Who Inject Drugs (PWIDs)—populations that are notoriously difficult to reach, treat, and retain in care.

Prior to 2018, West Virginia saw an annual average of just 67 new HIV diagnoses. Beginning in 2018, the state began seeing significant increases in new diagnoses, more than half of which were directly related to Injection Drug Use. This outbreak of new diagnoses among PWIDs was further exacerbated by the state’s increasing hostility toward comprehensive harm reduction measures, specifically Syringe Services Programs (SSPs). Even in 2020, when COVID-19-related shutdowns led to a 2/3 reduction in the number of HIV tests administered in the state of West Virginia, the state identified 135 new HIV infections, of which 108 (80%) were directly related to IDU.

Since 2020, the state has struggled significantly with increasing provider buy-in for proactive HIV testing, leaving the bulk of HIV testing to be done in hospital emergency rooms during overdose events (using an opt-out delivery method that requires informed denial of testing) and by a mere handful of non-profit agencies and the state’s overworked, but extremely dedicated, Director of HIV Care and Prevention. This Director is one of the very few in the United States who regularly goes into communities to conduct testing events. His efforts are, however, hampered by inadequate levels of state and federal funding and increased scrutiny from a state legislature that continues to grow more hostile to HIV testing and prevention efforts.

According to the most recent report, West Virginia identified 140 new cases of HIV in 2022, of which 98 (70%) were directly attributed to IDU. 2023 is likely to be an equally devastating year, with 25 of the 48 cases identified to date (52.1%) being directly related to IDU.

The thinking behind utilizing LAIs as the first-line treatment option in PWIDs is that it has the potential to increase treatment adherence in a population that often faces numerous barriers to care and treatment, including a potential lack of stable housing, a lack of safe places to store daily HIV regimens, a potential inability to remain consistent with treatment regimens.

Prior Authorization requirements for drugs that treat infectious diseases already create arguably unnecessary barriers to treatment for patients. West Virginia’s blanket refusal to cover an FDA-approved and highly effective HIV treatment regimen for patients who are already adherent and virally suppressed serves as an unacceptable and unconscionable barrier to care in a state that is in desperate need of more convenient treatment options.

While Cabenuva, Sunlenca, and Trogarzo are still relatively new drugs, state Medicaid programs should be jumping at the opportunity to decrease treatment abandonment rates and increase easy treatment options for qualifying patients. We hope that more programs will abandon unnecessary restrictions upon this vital tool in the HIV treatment toolkit.

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.  

Wednesday, June 28, 2023

Walmart’s Expanded HIV Services Promise Increased Access

By: Marcus J. Hopkins, ADAP Blog Guest Contributor, and Founder & Executive Director of the Appalachian Learning Initiative (APPLI)

Editor's Note: The Blogger platform classifies any use of the word "p(h)armacy" as being a sales promotion. As a result of this erroneous classification, the word and its derivations will be typed using that format in order to avoid being flagged as a sales promotion.

In December 2022, Walmart announced that it would be expanding its Special P(h)armacies of the Community (SPOCs) to support communities with high rates of HIV to include stores in North Brunswick and North Bergen, NJ, Monticello, NY, and Hartford, CT. Those locations joined the initial three locations opened as part of their pilot program.

Since then, Walmart has opened an additional 70 locations, totaling 77 SPOCs located in Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Texas, and Virginia. By the end of 2023, Walmart has promised more than 80 locations across eleven states.

According to their initial press release, Walmart claims that these SPOCs:

will help with all aspects of care, including industry-leading clinical programs, p(h)armacy services provided by HIV-trained p(h)armacists, enhanced care coordination, healthy lifestyle recommendations, and finding emotional support services from our Community Health Workers.

Walmart's SPOCs are located inside of individual p(h)armacies within the stores, ostensibly making the locations convenient to patients and those seeking HIV preventative care.

There are, it should be said, significant benefits to Walmart beyond just the good press.  Walmart has enormous opportunities to earn profits by accessing the 340B Drug Pricing Program’s inclusion of HIV medications. According to a 2019 report by Drug Channels, an estimated 25,000 p(h)armacies acted as contract p(h)armacies for hospitals and other covered entities that participate in the 340B program, and six large retail chains—Walgreens, CVS, Walmart, Rite Aid, Kroger, and Albertsons—account for two-thirds of 340B contract p(h)armacy locations.

In recent years, 340B program profits have soared with little to no oversight or enforcement, and we would be remiss if we didn't mention that Walmart stands to earn significant profits from serving as the contract p(h)armacy for People Living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), particularly in the markets they've chosen.

Which brings me to the next point:

As Walmart pointed out in its December 2022 statement, roughly 90% of the U.S. population lives within 10 miles of a Walmart location. They also state that these SPOCs provide “…an opportunity to reach people who might not otherwise have access to or seek out HIV care.”

And yet…the locations of these SPOCs are in areas of the country that already receive the bulk of federal funding for HIV testing, services, and treatment. Almost every location is in an urban or suburban population center—areas that often already have p(h)armacies specializing in HIV treatment and care.

It is obvious that these locations were chosen in accordance with the Ending the HIV Epidemic's (EHE) Phase 1 jurisdictions, which resulted in federal HIV funds being directed to the counties and cities where HIV incidence is highest. This methodology is all well and good, but it misses the larger scope of the HIV epidemic and fails to fill the gaps left by this federal funding "plan".

It is curious, then, that Walmart argues that these locations will "…reach people who might not otherwise have access to or seek out HIV care," when those areas are already glutted with services compared to other areas of the country. Looking at Orlando alone, there are 25 providers of care, and four dedicated p(h)macies dedicated to providing services to PLWHA.

If the purpose is to expand access, Walmart would be better suited to open SPOCs in farther-flung areas of those states, where patients are already required to travel more than 30 minutes to access HIV services. Opening a SPOC in Florida’s rural counties, such as Okeechobee, Hardee, DeSoto, Highlands, or Glades, would provide patients living outside of urban areas better access to care and services.

Beyond just the nine current and two potential states where Walmart's SPOCs have or will be opened, there are significant gaps in care and p(h)armacy services in states like Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee, central and western Virginia, and West Virginia—areas that are largely rural, but have either significant existing populations of PLWHA or face increased risks of HIV transmission either through sexual contact or through Injection Drug Use.

To be clear, I am not being critical of Walmart for expanding services to be inclusive of PLWHA and those seeking preventative services. I am absolutely in favor of a "Yes, And" approach to HIV services provision. The addition of more providers has the potential to provide patients with more choices of where to receive care, and additional opportunities and points of care may allow patients to access services in places that are convenient to them. Additionally, increasing the number of providers has the potential to break HIV care outside of the longstanding monopolistic service provision models that exist both locally and nationally, where patients have been essentially forced to access care, treatment, and supportive services from providers because there hasn’t been anywhere else to go, even if those providers have treated them poorly, engaged in unethical practices, or provided services that aren't culturally competent or sufficient to meet the needs of their patient populations.

That said, Walmart, CVS, and Walgreens haven't really managed to make their locations places where patients—particularly those attempting to access sexual or reproductive healthcare services—feel safe accessing those services or openly discussing concerns with staff p(h)armacists. There’s a distinct lack of personal connection in highly corporate locations, and when you're dealing with fraught issues such as those presented with HIV care and treatment (or other chronic conditions), the last place you want to be if you're having a tough time dealing with issues is in the middle of a large shopping center surrounded by random people trying to find the potato chip aisle.

Overall, however, the expansion of Walmart's SPOC locations seems like a good thing, even if the locations they've chosen don’t really provide services that are novel to those areas. Time will tell whether or not they have any real impact.

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.  

Thursday, June 16, 2022

Housing Opportunities Missed and Lost

By: Marcus J. Hopkins, Founder & Executive Director, Appalachian Learning Initiative

In December 2021, a Ryan White Part B caseworker contacted me to ask whom I knew in the West Virginia Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) state's office. In the few months prior to this request, the Part B office had been beset with clients reaching out to their Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (Ryan White) caseworkers in frustration and desperation:

"I've been trying to reach my HOPWA caseworker for three months, and nobody will call me back."

"I filled out the paperwork in June, but I haven't heard anything back, and it’s October."

"My electricity was just disconnected after HOPWA didn't pay the bill for three months."

"I've received an eviction notice after HOPWA didn't pay the rent for two months in a row."

"The sober living facility has told me that if HOPWA doesn’t come through with my rent payments, I’ll have to find another place to live."

It turned out that this inability to reach HOPWA caseworkers was not isolated to clients—the Ryan White caseworkers and West Virginia state officials were unable to get responses, either. In the midst of a global pandemic, when having stable housing meant the difference between being able to quarantine and being out in the elements with no protection, one of West Virginia's HOPWA grantees has all but collapsed, leaving clients scrambling to find solutions to problems they were promised would be solved and other state and federal programs scrambling just as desperately to pick up the pieces.

What is HOPWA, and How Does it Work for Grantees and Patients…or Not?

The HOPWA program was created in 1992 through the AIDS Housing Opportunity Act to address the critical housing needs of lower-income Americans living with HIV and their families (AIDS Housing Opportunity Act, 1992). This Act situated the HOPWA program in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), making it one of the only HIV-related services and assistance programs situated outside of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service (HHS). It is also the only program dedicated to the housing needs of People Living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA).

HOPWA is funded through two mechanisms:

1. Formula Grants:

Ninety percent (90%) of the allocated HOPWA funds are dedicated to what HUD defines as formula grantees, including states and cities within metropolitan statistical areas or jurisdictions, which either administer the funds themselves or sub-contract with local agencies. Health Centers can partner with these local grantees and agencies. THESE GRANTS ARE NON-COMPETITIVE!

2. Competitive Grants:

Ten percent (10%) of the funds fall under competitive grants, which can be awarded to state and local governments and non-profit organizations. Competitive grants are only awarded when funds are available after formula contracted grants are renewed. This means that funds can be administered by a range of entities for each community, from local HIV/AIDS service providers to city and state housing and community development departments or public health departments, and/or partnerships with health centers. (Corporation for Supportive Housing, 2018).

The funds, themselves, are designated for the following purposes:

  • The acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of housing units
  • Costs for facility operations
  • Rental assistance and short-term payments to prevent homelessness.
  • The coordination and delivery of support services including (but not limited to):
    • Assessment and case management
    • Substance abuse treatment
    • Mental health treatment
    • Nutritional services
    • Job training and placement assistance
    • Assistance with daily living (HUD Exchange, 2022a)

In 2016, outgoing President Barack Obama signed the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act (HOTMA) in an effort to better address housing needs across the various HUD-situated housing programs, including HOPWA (HOTMA, 2016). One of the primary changes to HOPWA included revising the statute to include “people living with HIV” rather than just those living with a clinical diagnosis of "AIDS". This effectively changed the formula from:

  • Original Formula - # of cumulative AIDS cases

to:

  • Modernized Formula - # of people living with HIV/AIDS (and other factors)

The change to the formula that determines funding essentially means that funds can and will shift according to the geographic jurisdictions with the highest incidence of people living with HIV from year to year. It also set a new baseline for eligible jurisdictions of 2,000 living HIV/AIDS cases. Additionally, it removed the requirement that 25% of funds be distributed to cities based on AIDS incidence and introduced a new requirement that 25% of funds be distributed based on local Fair Market Rents (FMRs) and poverty rates (HUD Exchange, 2017)

Figure 1. HOPWA Formula Modernization Through the Housing Opportunities Through Modernization Act

HOPWA Formula Modernization
Source: HUD Exchange, 2017

How HOPWA Works for Grantees But Fails People Living With HIV

From the very outset, it should be made clear that the HOPWA program, along with virtually every resource available on the Internet, is geared not toward PLWHA (read: "clients" or "patients"), but toward Grantees. From the patient's perspective, finding even basic information about the HOPWA program, one’s eligibility for the program, how to apply, whom to contact, or how to resolve issues with grantees is a Sisyphean task. This issue is further complicated by the fact that there are no comprehensive lists of grantees, contact information, service provision, application processes, or housing availability.

Approximately 7% of Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP) clients had temporary housing, and nearly 5% had unstable housing in 2020, with the highest reported housing-insecure age groups being those aged 20-39. Just 72.7% of RWHAP clients experiencing housing insecurity are retained in care. 76.8% of patients experiencing housing insecurity achieved viral suppression in 2020 (Health Resources and Services Administration, 2021). Because of this, stable housing is vital for achieving and maintaining viral suppression in order to decrease the transmission of HIV in the United States.

Most HOPWA grants are non-competitive, meaning that the funds are automatically awarded to specific jurisdictions based on the formula outlined in Figure 1. Those funds are then either administered directly by those jurisdictional governments or regranted and disbursed to contracted organizations within the jurisdiction to provide direct services. The competitive granting process is contingent upon whether or not any funds remain after the non-competitive grants are awarded.

Part of what makes this process frustrating for both patients and grantees is that federal allocations for HOPWA are low relative to the actual cost of housing. For the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year (FY 2017-2018), total HUD funding amounted to $54.66 billion (HUD, 2019b). Of that, $351.5 million—just 0.6% of the total HUD Congressional allocation (Figure 2)—was dedicated to the HOPWA Program (HUD, 2019a).

Figure 2. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Funding, FY 2018

Total HUD Funding

Sources: HUD, 2019a and 2019b

This low level of federal funding for the only housing program designed explicitly for PLWHA means that grantees are only able to serve a limited number of households (meaning one patient per household). Even if patients are lucky enough to figure out how to apply for the HOPWA program, they are very likely to encounter waiting lists in virtually every jurisdiction. An excellent example of this exists in the state of Delaware:

In 2021, Delaware received a total of $1,951,658 in HOPWA funding (HUD Exchange, 2022b):

  • $1,160,648 in Formula grants
    • Delaware (Balance of the State) – $336,185
    • Wilmington, DE – $824,463
  • $791,010 in Competitive grants
    • Ministry of Caring (Wilmington, DE)

While Delaware has 3,483 PLWHA living in the state (Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, 2021), its HOPWA program currently serves approximately 150 households—just 4% of the state’s PLWHA population (Delaware HIV Consortium, n.d.). Despite serving just 150 households.

Delaware is one of the more straightforward states to examine. In Ft. Lauderdale, FL, we received reports of 8-year-long waiting lists to fill just a handful of spots. These waiting lists will only grow as PLWHA live longer, earn less, and remain financially eligible for the program.

Attempting to Find Patient-Friendly HOPWA Information

As part of this research effort, the Appalachian Learning Initiative (APPLI, pronounced "apply") conducted a web search to find state-level information about HOPWA programs across the United States and Puerto Rico. Using the search term "[STATE NAME] apply for HOPWA", APPLI searched for state-sponsored websites that provide patient-centered content, including: 

  • HOPWA Program Information
  • Services Provided
  • Eligibility Criteria
  • Application Processes
  • Required Documentation (e.g., identification, income verification, proof of HIV status, et cetera)
  • Regional Office Contact Information
  • State Office Listing and Contact Information
  • Grantee Listing and Contact Information
  • Processes for Client-Initiated Complaints

This search was restricted to state-level sites rather than jurisdiction- and grantee-level websites. While 27 states had websites with patient-centered content, just 8 states (FL, GA, IA, ME, NM, OR, SC, and WA) met at least 6 of the 8 information criteria. Twelve (12) states had no state-level HOPWA information (Figure 3 & Appendix 1). Download Appendix 1.

Figure 3. State Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) Websites

State Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS

Source: Appalachian Learning Initiative

While most states had some HOPWA information available on state-level websites, just 21 state websites listed the names of HOPWA grantees and subgrantees in the state, and only 18 provided contact information for those grantees. Moreover, only 12 state websites provided information about the application process and/or the documents required to apply. Virtually no website mentioned the number of clients served, the status of waitlists or the current wait times on those lists, or outlined a complaint process for client-initiated grievances (e.g., reporting grantees that fail to remit payments in a timely manner). Another unique factor to illustrate was that, for many states, finding these information points required downloading and searching multipage documents filled with complicated processes clearly designed for grantees, rather than patients (APPLI, 2022).

The Need for a Better Resource

The primary issue that APPLI’s research has uncovered is a vast dearth of patient-centered and patient-friendly information available to PLWHA about the HOPWA program. It is, essentially, a program that serves relatively few clients compared to the number of patients in need of housing assistance. This has created an environment where HIV advocates consistently highlight the need for more funding but rarely examine how PLWHA are impacted by how those funds are allocated, disbursed, and utilized.

With this in mind, the Appalachian Learning Initiative has entered into the planning phase of developing a national HOPWA Directory and a patient-centric HOPWA research initiative.

This idea is in its infancy, but I firmly believe that the patient voice is vital to initiating change, as with most public health issues. There will be obstacles to overcome—funding for these initiatives being one of the greatest—but ensuring that patients are easily able to access information about housing assistance for PLWHA is most certainly worth the effort.

Stay tuned for more information as it becomes available.

References:

  • AIDS Housing Opportunity Act, 42 U.S.C. Ch. 131 §§12901-12912 (1992). http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title42/chapter131&edition=prelim
  • Appalachian Learning Initiative. (2022, June 07). State Housing Opportunity for Persons with AIDS Websites. Unpublished.
  • Corporation for Supportive Housing. (2018). HUD Policy Brief: Understanding the Impact and Potential for Health Centers. New York, NY: Corporation for Supportive Housing. https://www.csh.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CSH_HUD-Briefs_-HOPWA.pdf
  • Delaware Department of Health and Social Services. (2021, January 22). DELAWARE HIV SURVEILLANCE REPORT FOR CASES DIAGNOSED THROUGH DECEMBER 2019. New Castle, DE: Delaware Department of Health and Social Services: Department of Public Health: Health Data and Statistics: HIV Statistics – Epidemiology/Surveillance Profile. https://www.dhss.delaware.gov/dhss/dph/epi/files/2020hivepiprofile.pdf
  • Delaware HIV Consortium. (n.d.). HIV Housing Programs. Wilmington, DE: Delaware HIV Consortium: Housing Programs. https://www.delawarehiv.org/housing-programs/
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2019a). FY 2020 CONGRESSIONAL JUSTIFICATIONS: COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PERSONS WITH AIDS (HOPWA). Washington, DC: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development: Program Offices: Chief Financial Officer: Reports. https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/CFO/documents/2020CJ-HOPWA.pdf
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2019b). FY 2020 CONGRESSIONAL JUSTIFICATIONS: INTRODUCTION. Washington, DC: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development: Program Offices: Chief Financial Officer: Reports. https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/CFO/documents/2020CJ-INTRODUCTION.pdf
  • Health Resources and Services Administration. (2021, December). Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Annual Client-Level Data Report 2020. Rockville, MD: United States Department of Health and Human Services: Health Resources and Services Administration: HIV/AIDS Bureau: Division of Policy and Data. https://ryanwhite.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/ryanwhite/data/rwhap-annual-client-level-data-report-2020.pdf
  • Housing Opportunities Through Modernization Act, Pub. L. No. 114-201, § (a) 130 Stat. 782 (2016). https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%22Housing+Opportunity+Through+Modernization+Act%22&f=treesort&fq=true&num=0&hl=true&edition=prelim&granuleId=USC-prelim-title42-section1437
  • HUD Exchange. (2017, July 17). HOPWA Modernization: What Communities Need to Know. Washington, DC: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development: HUD Exchange: Trainings. http://www.meeting-support.com/downloads/244402/10944/PPT%20V2.pdf
  • HUD Exchange. (2022a). HOPWA Eligibility Requirements. Washington, DC: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development: HUD Exchange: Programs: Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS. https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/hopwa/hopwa-eligibility-requirements/
  • HUD Exchange. (2022b). HUD Awards and Allocations: HOPWA. Washington, DC: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development: HUD Exchange: About Grantees: Awards and Allocations. https://www.hudexchange.info/grantees/allocations-awards/?params=%7B%22limit%22%3A20%2C%22COC%22%3Afalse%2C%22sort%22%3A%22%22%2C%22min%22%3A%22%22%2C%22years%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dir%22%3A%22%22%2C%22grantees%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22state%22%3A%22%22%2C%22programs% 

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.

Thursday, May 12, 2022

What Happens When Homelessness, Politics, and HIV Collide?

By: Ranier Simons, ADAP Blog Guest Contributor

It is a futile waste of time and resources to try to improve the quality of life and standards of living for communities without examining social determinants of health. Social determinants of health (SDOH) are "individuals' personal circumstances that impact their health and well-being."[1] SDOH's five main domains are economic stability, education access and quality, healthcare access and quality, neighborhood and built environments, and social and community context.[2] The health and well-being of populations suffer greatly when SDOH are not adequately met. The devastating effects of the confluence of homelessness, drug addiction, and mental health issues currently is becoming increasingly visible all across the United States. Currently, West Virginia is confronting an avoidable community-level disaster.

Social Determinants of Health
Photo Source: Kaiser Family Foundation

Images of the plight of the impoverished living amidst urban sprawl are familiar. Unfortunately, there is also increasing amounts of suffering going under the radar in small cities and towns. One such town is Charleston, West Virginia. In Charleston, politics, homelessness, mental illness, and preventable infectious diseases, including HIV, swirl in a blender resulting in a smoothie of despair. People with grassroots first-hand knowledge of the plight of West Virginians are trying to shed light on their struggle. Marcus J. Hopkins, Founder & Executive Director of the Appalachian Learning Initiative (APPLI), is one such person. According to Mr. Hopkins, "The issues that plague West Virginia's population are not something that can be easily, efficiently, or quickly addressed."

"One of the unfortunate truths of life in West Virginia is that we are constantly trying not to correct, but to overcome—to survive—generations of economic decline, an education system that has been perennially underfunded and underperforming, a healthcare system that barely functions and only in a handful of cities in the state, a crumbling infrastructure, and communities that have been ravaged by nearly 30 years of prescription and illicit opioid use disorders in every part of the state. The state and federal governments have been virtually useless in addressing these issues, which results in grassroots organizations doing whatever they have to do in order to try to just keep people alive, only to have their actions criminalized by the very governments that are supposed to be helping."

Charleston has an unhoused population plagued by drug addiction, mental illness, and HIV. There is an abidance of evidence showing harm reduction is a proven solution to the poorly met SDOH of this population. However, politics have gotten in the way. According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), "Harm reduction plays a significant role in preventing drug-related deaths and offering access to healthcare, social services, and treatment. This results in a reduction of overdose fatalities, acute life-threatening infections related to unsterile drug injection, and chronic diseases such as HIV/HCV."[3] 

The unhoused population in Charleston struggles with finding safe shelter, food, and even places to bathe or wash clothing. People have lived under bridges, uncovered on the streets ,and in unofficial tent camps in public spaces. Soup kitchens and places like the Manna Meal lunchroom are places where the unhoused and other poor citizens go to find sustenance. However, not having stable housing and food insecurity are exacerbated by drug addiction and HIV.[4]

Politics has shuttered places that used to be havens of clean needle exchanges for those addicted to intravenous drugs like heroin and other opioids. A nonprofit called SOAR ran a clean needle exchange on Charleston's west side until it was outlawed last summer.[4] Before that, the city of Charleston ended its own needle exchange in 2018. Without clean needle exchanges, people reuse and even share needles. This results in the spread of hepatitis, heart inflammation, and endocarditis (infection of the heart's inner lining). The U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) found that needle exchanges cut the rates of these diseases by half.[4] Treating hepatitis C in Charleston costs $25,0000 per person, while a new needle costs 50 cents.[4]

Sharing needles also contributes to the spread of HIV. The West Virginia public health bureau reports that since 2019 there have been 137 HIV cases diagnosed in Kanawha County, where Charleston is located,[4] and 76.6% of the cases in Kanawha County were directly related to injection drug use.[5] In 2020, 207 people died from overdoses in Kanawha County, which is one of the highest death rates in the state, while West Virginia, as a whole, has the highest overdose death rate in the United States.[4]

Homeless man with IDU needle
Photo Source: GETTY IMAGES

Politics also is a barrier to helping the homeless. There is political pressure to criminalize being homeless on the street. Police destroy the tents and shelters that many of the unhoused have built, in addition to disposing of their meager belongings. Recommendations for creating places like drop-in shelters for the homeless are usually met with opposition from business owners and other people who want the homeless to be swept out. They do not want to see them sleeping on park benches or the door stoops of their businesses. Other people do not want the visual reminder of the homeless’ existence and plight. 

People living with medical conditions, possibly mental illness, drug addiction, and no stable social network cannot be expected to thrive when trying to manage all of those things, in addition to being homeless. Proper harm reduction requires robust funding and programmatic infrastructure. It is necessary to help people get off of the streets and then help them maintain stability to stay off.

[1] Zia, S. (2021, April 28). What are social determinants of health? Retrieved from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/social-determinants-of-health
[2] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.(2022). Social Determinants of Health. Retrieved from https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health
[3] 
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.(2022). Harm Reduction. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/find-help/harm-reduction#:~:text=Harm%20reduction%20plays%20a%20significant,diseases%20such%20as%20HIV%2FHCV
[4] Vergano, D. (2022, April 22). Here’s how homelessness and politics meet amid an HIV outbreak in one U.S .city. Retrieved from https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/hiv-homelessness-politics-colliding-west-183301994.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw&tsrc=twtr
[5] Office of Epidemiology and Prevention Services. (2022, April 21). HIV Diagnoses by County, West Virginia, 2019-2022. Charleston, WV: West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources: Office of Epidemiology and Prevention Services: HIV and AIDS. Retrieved from: https://oeps.wv.gov/hiv-aids/Documents/Data/WV_HIV_2019-2022.pdf

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.