ViiV's Positive Perspectives Research Provides Insights to Patient-Provider Relationships

By: Ranier Simons, ADAP Blog Guest Contributor

The doctor-patient relationship is the cornerstone of healthcare. Patients cannot fully benefit from the many advances in medical science without a solid relationship with their provider, where they feel listened to and cared for. The relationship has been defined as “a consensual relationship in which the patient knowingly seeks the physician’s assistance and in which the physician knowingly accepts the person as a patient” (Chipedza et al., 2015). Mutual trust and vulnerability are required, especially regarding people who are living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). ViiV Healthcare recently released data from the third wave of its Positive Perspectives Research study (PP3), which examines the lived experiences of PLWHA globally. This wave of inquiry is heavily focused on improving health outcomes by digging into the interactions between PLWHA and their healthcare providers.

Photo Source: GoodTherapy

The current wave, PP3, will eventually include 3,000 participants. The newly released data is a result of the first 698 participants representing 16 countries, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada (Lutton, 2025). Eventually, it will cover 29 countries. Wave One surveyed 1,111 PLWHA and 250 of their partners, covering nine countries. Wave 2 involved 2,389 PLWHA covering 25 countries (ViiV, Press Release 2025). All the waves investigate various themes surrounding the lived experiences of PLWHA. PP3 aims to further define and raise the voices of PLWHA to improve healthcare outcomes by informing healthcare providers and other stakeholders of the realities of how PLWHA navigate their care and day-to-day lives.

Early PP3 data suggest an overarching theme of communication issues between PLWHA and their healthcare providers. The early findings indicate that there are strong levels of trust in PLWHA’s patient-provider relationships. Approximately 80% of those currently surveyed reported trusting their healthcare provider. (Lutton, 2025). However, while the trust is solid, there are reported weaknesses in areas such as patients' practical understanding of information and their inclusion in care decisions.

Photo Source: Doctor Patient Relationship

Although a high level of trust has been reported, 47.5% of PLWHA surveyed feel that their healthcare providers do not effectively listen to them, and 39.7% reported that they were not included in the choice of their antiretroviral regimen (ART) (ViiV, 2025). Successful HIV health outcomes are holistic, involving more than just a focus on viral suppression. Patients need to be able to fully express their values, preferences, and individual life circumstances to their healthcare providers. Empathy is associated with patient satisfaction and treatment adherence (James, 2023). When healthcare professionals truly listen, they can better understand how their patients interact with life, which is often vastly different from their own lives and familiar ways of thinking.

Part of ART selection is based on patients’ specific virological needs. However, there are nuances of selection that are influenced by patient preference when patients are fully informed of all their options. The preliminary study results indicated that 53% of patients were worried about long-term effects of ART (ViiV Press Release, 2025). ART comes in many different combinations of drugs with the potential for short-term and long-term side effects. Approximately 53% of respondents had ART-related weight gain as a side effect concern. It is essential for healthcare professionals to engage in transparent discussions about the aspects of different drug combinations, empowering patients to make informed decisions rather than leaving them to accept the physical manifestations of regimens that are unilaterally imposed upon them. Patients’ ability to be consistent with their regimen is also a consideration in education about all modalities, such as long-acting injectables. Approximately 43.2% of the current respondent group stated a disdain for daily medication because it was a daily reminder of their HIV status (ViiV Press Release, 2025). When patients feel fully included in their care, they are more likely to adhere to their medication schedule.

Photo Source: Patient Voices

A notable early revelation of the study is that the concept of undetectable equals untransmittable, or “U=U”, is not fully embraced or understood. Medical science has proven that PLWHA cannot transmit the HIV virus when they have reached and maintained an undetectable viral load. However, only 58% of respondents truly believed it. Approximately 93.7% knew U=U, but low uptake of it as a belief system means that many PLWHA are not empowered to fully live their lives without the guilt and stigma of embracing their relationships and sexual expression. Moreover, only 31.1% of patients were able to explain the concept of U=U to other people (ViiV Press Release, 2025). It is essential for healthcare providers to thoroughly educate PLWHA on the science behind U=U, enabling them to advocate for themselves and combat stigma within their social networks.

Wave three of the Patient Perspectives study is only partially complete. The goal of 3,000 participants will yield a more comprehensive picture of the patient-doctor relationship, providing healthcare professionals with an informed understanding of its strengths and weaknesses. Understanding what is being done well in comparison to areas needing improvement will enable providers to make effective changes to the status quo. Health literacy is influenced by socioeconomic status, age, racial and ethnic factors, and educational levels (Dawson-Rose et al., 2016). Once fully completed, PP3 will inform healthcare providers on how to facilitate improvements in patients’ health literacy, as well as bolster care professionals’ ability to step outside their own spheres of understanding into an empathetic place of true patient communication.

[1] Chipidza, F. E., Wallwork, R. S., & Stern, T. A. (2015). Impact of the Doctor-Patient Relationship. The primary care companion for CNS disorders, 17(5), 10.4088/PCC.15f01840. https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.15f01840

[2] Dawson-Rose, C., Cuca, Y. P., Webel, A. R., Solís Báez, S. S., Holzemer, W. L., Rivero-Méndez, M., Eller, L. S., Reid, P., Johnson, M. O., Kemppainen, J., Reyes, D., Nokes, K., Nicholas, P. K., Matshediso, E., Mogobe, K. D., Sabone, M. B., Ntsayagae, E. I., Shaibu, S., Corless, I. B., … Lindgren, T. (2016). Building Trust and relationships between patients and providers: An essential complement to health literacy in HIV care. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 27(5), 574–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2016.03.001

[3] James, T. (2023, January 12). Building Empathy into the Stucture of Health Care. Retrieved from https://postgraduateeducation.hms.harvard.edu/trends-medicine/building-empathy-structure-health-care#:~:text=Studies%20demonstrate%20how%20empathy%20improves,they%20feel%20heard%20and%20understood.

[4] ViiV Healthcare. (May 2025). Positive Perspectives Research. Retrieved from https://viivhealthcare.com/hiv-community-engagement/positive-perspectives-research/#:~:text=Wave%203%20survey

[5] ViiV Press Release. (2025, May 27). ViiV Healthcare Positive Perspectives 3 Study Finds Widespread Communication Barriers: Half of People Living with HIV Feel Unheard by Healthcare Providers Despite High Trust. Retrieved from https://viivhealthcare.com/hiv-news-and-media/news/press-releases/2025/may/positive-perspectives-survey/

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.   

U=U Principles Now Includes Breast Feeding

By: Ranier Simons, ADAP Blog Guest Contributor

The phrase ‘undetectable equals untransmittable’, commonly referred to as U=U, originated from the efforts of the Prevention Access Campaign in 2016.[1] This phrase explains the current scientific consensus that a person living with HIV (PLWHA) who has undetectable levels of the virus in their blood does not pose an infection risk and will not sexually pass the virus on to their partners.[2] Medical research is proving that U=U extends past sexual activities. A recent May 2024 clinical report released by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) indicates evidence shows it is acceptable for HIV-positive mothers to breastfeed.[3] This is a reversal of previous guidance banning the activity.

Photo Source: CNN.com

Recommendations against breastfeeding by PLWHA date as far back as 1985, following the start of the HIV pandemic. This was well before the advent of modern antiretrovirals (ART). Before ART, about 30 percent of maternal-to-infant HIV transmission occurred during breastfeeding. In the early 1990s, there were about 2000 breastmilk-related transmissions annually in the US. Presently, the risk of maternal-to-infant HIV transmission from a parent who is on ART and is virally suppressed is less than one percent.[3]

The recently updated guidelines from the AAP follow 2023 updated recommendations by an advisory panel to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). That panel recommendation stated, “People with HIV should receive evidence-based, patient-centered counseling to support shared decision-making about infant feeding…individuals with HIV who are on ART with a sustained undetectable viral load and who choose to breastfeed should be supported in this decision”.[4] In order to allow PLWHA to breastfeed safely, the AAP updated guidance lists specific requirements. ART must be initiated early in or before the pregnancy, sustained viral suppression must be maintained along with consistent access to ART, and infant prophylactic medication must be administered.[3] The guidelines also recommend regular monitoring of the parent’s viral load. Additionally, research indicates that if PLWHA are going to breastfeed, they must exclusively breastfeed for the first six months of the infant’s life without switching back and forth to formula.[3] Switching could increase transmission risk due to interruptions in the infants’ gut environment.

About 5,000 PLWHA give birth annually.[5] The new guidelines end the history of denying PLWHA the bond created between parent and child with breastfeeding. 

Photo Source: The Well Project

Bruce Richman, the Executive Director of the Prevention Access Campaign, explains, “This is incredible news for the rights, choice, and autonomy of people living with HIV and the joy and intimacy of parenthood! Too many people living with HIV faced criminalization and having their infants removed by child protective services if they chose to breastfeed or chestfeed despite this being a safe method when undetectable." 

Richman further stated the updates to guidance for pediatricians complement the recent HHS and Centers for Disease Control & Prevention [CDC] guidelines updates and further support people living with HIV in making healthy reproductive choices for themselves and their infants.” 

Breastfeeding has health-related benefits for both parent and infant in addition to the familial bond. Breastmilk provides optimal infant nutrition and protection from morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases, allergic conditions, obesity, diabetes, autoimmunity, and sudden infant death syndrome.[3] Breastfeeding protects the parent from breast and ovarian cancer, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes.[3]

Pediatricians and physicians receive their clinical guidance from groups such as the CDC, HHS, and AAP. It is crucial that these new guidelines be widespread and utilized to change the current paradigm of many medical professionals. Unfortunately, many clinicians still hold outdated attitudes regarding HIV as well as they are not up to date on evidence-based science. The new AAP guidelines will enable clinicians to support PLWHA in their decision to breastfeed and empower them to be partners in their care instead of just being told what they can and cannot do with their bodies and infants. The AAP plans to have webinars for clinicians concerning the new guidelines in hopes of effecting widespread adoption of the latest evidence-based recommendations.

Photo Source: American Academy of Pediatrics

Not only is U=U positively affecting breastfeeding, but it is enabling freedoms for PLWHA concerning conception. In the United Kingdom, laws are changing that will now allow heterosexual and same-sex couples with non-transmissible HIV to become parents.[6,7] Amendments to the Human Fertilization and Embryology Act will allow PLWHA with undetectable viral status to donate eggs or sperm to their partners. 

Current IVF law only allows male PLWHA to donate sperm to their female partners exclusively. This means that before the law changed, they could not donate to family or friends. Additionally, the law amendment will allow female same-sex couples undergoing shared motherhood IVF treatment to conceive. In the shared IVF treatment, one partner of the sero-discordant couple provides the egg, and the other carries the embryo.[6] The stipulations for PLWHA wishing to donate under the new law are: they have to have a sustained undetectable viral load, have to prove they have been on ART for at least six months prior to donation, and the person receiving the gamete consents and is aware of the donor’s HIV status.[6]

Not only have medical advancements changed an HIV diagnosis from a death sentence to a matter of chronic disease management, but they are continually taking the shackles off PLWHA's ability to live their lives. HIV stigma still exists. However, the more the understanding of U=U spreads, the easier the lives of PLWHA will become. Moreover, as medical advancements continue, U=U and future achievements will allow PLWHA to live as wholly integrated members of society defined by their humanity and not their disease.

[1] Third Amended Class Action Complaint. (2023, October 24) ). Retrieved from https://consumerwatchdog.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/2023-10-24-241_Third-Amended-Complaint.pdf

[2] John Doe One et al. v. CVS Pharmacy Ruling. (2024, April 18). Retrieved from https://www.courthousenews.com/cvs-medication-program-discriminates-against-hiv-aids-patients-judge-says/john-doe-one-et-al-v-cvs-pharmacy-et-al-mtd-ruling/

[3] Doe One et al. v. CVS Health Corporation et al. (2018, March 21). Retrieved from https://dockets.justia.com/docket/ohio/ohsdce/2:2018cv00238/211764

[4] Faul, A. (2018, March 29). CVS Health unintentionally revealed HIV status of 6,000 customers: Lawsuit. Retrieved fromhttps://abcnews.go.com/Health/cvs-health-unintentionally-revealed-hiv-status-6000-customers/story?id=54095674

[5] Schladen, M. (2018, June 29). State, CVS sued over HIV mailing. Retrieved from https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/politics/elections/2018/06/29/state-cvs-sued-over-hiv/11624806007/

[6] AIMED Alliance. (2020, May 15). CVS Health to Settle Lawsuit for Revealing HIV Status of Over 4,500 Patients. Retrieved fromhttps://aimedalliance.org/cvs-health-to-settle-lawsuit-for-revealing-hiv-status-of-over-4500-patients/

[7] Accetta, L. (2021). Expanding therapies, indications and implications for payors: Pipeline trends that will drive change in 2022. Retrieved from https://business.caremark.com/insights/2021/expanding-therapies-indications-and-implications-payors.html   

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.  

Ending the HIV Epidemic Hindered by Negative Attitudes, Misinformation & Stigma

By: Brandon M. Macsata, CEO, ADAP Advocacy Association

Is the United States' Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) being stymied by the American public's long-standing negative views on HIV/AIDS, largely fueled by misinformation and stigma? A recent national survey suggests the answer to that question is an unfortunate yes. The EHE initiative's four science-based strategies - Diagnose, Treat, Prevent, and Respond - apparently have an uphill battle against bigotry, fear and ignorance. 

Less than half of the American public (48%) consider themselves knowledgeable about HIV, which is slightly less than polling done the previous year. One-in-two non-LGBTQ people surveyed (53%) expressed hesitation receiving care from an HIV-positive medical professional, and one-third (35%) held similar attitudes about an HIV-positive teacher.[1] These attitudes reflect opinions held in 2021, not 1981.

Photo Source: GLAAD

The report, “The State of HIV Stigma 2021,” was spearheaded by GLAAD, Gilead Sciences and the Southern AIDS Coalition. Addressing the challenges laid out in the report, GLAAD summarized: "The findings reflect a vast lack of understanding of HIV and how it can be prevented, as well as significant discomfort and unfounded fear about people living with HIV. The Deep South has the highest rates of HIV diagnosis, yet the study reveals that the U.S. South also has some of the highest discomfort levels pertaining to the virus. This is a perfect storm for the perpetuation of misinformation."[2]

So much has been accomplished in the fight against HIV/AIDS since the 1990s with the advent of the highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART), culminating with the growing acceptance of the science behind U=U ("Undetectable equals untransmissible"). Yet according to the GLAAD report, only 42% knew that someone properly following an antiretroviral drug regimen can’t transmit the virus.[3]  If making U=U foundational in our efforts to end the HIV epidemic is required, then we have much more work to do.

Photo Source: GLAAD

Sadly, among straight, cisgender respondents, half appeared to have closed to door to loving a partner or spouse living with HIV. HALF! Maybe even more troubling is over one-third of the LGBTQ community expressed similar reservations.[4]

The South and Midwest regions of the country reflected higher levels of these negative attitudes, which also correlate with a culture of shame and greater prevalence of HIV criminalization laws.[5] Stigma continues to be a major hurdle in the ongoing efforts to educate Americans about HIV/AIDS. These efforts are further hindered by the incendiary language used by Donald J. Trump about Haitian immigrants and AIDS, or the insensitive, homophobic language used by rapper DaBabby about people living with HIV/AIDS, or the cruel "clean" characterization used by men on gay dating and hookup apps and websites. 

The media isn't without blame here, either. Approximately 6 in 10 Americans get their information about HIV/AIDS from the media.[6] Fortunately, GLAAD's report indicates "56% of non-LGBTQ respondents noted they are seeing more stories about people living with HIV in the media."[7]

"Measuring American attitudes toward HIV and the impact stigma has on people living with HIV" is at the heart of the GLAAD report,[8] and their efforts to monitor the country's mood on this issue is of paramount importance. The success, or failure, of the public policy strategies being employed to end the HIV epidemic will largely depend on combating negative attitudes, misinformation, and stigma.

[1] Kumamoto, Ian (2021, August 26). Half of Americans still don't know shit about HIV — and it's a real problem. MIC. Retrieved online at https://www.mic.com/life/people-know-even-less-about-hiv-than-they-used-to-according-to-new-research-84167181
[2] GLAAD (2021). 2021 State of HIV Stigma Study. Retrieved online at https://www.glaad.org/endhivstigma 
[3] Avery, Dan (2021, August 26). Half of Americans say they’d avoid an HIV-positive doctor. NBC News. Retrieved online at https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/half-of-americans-say-theyd-avoid-an-hiv-positive-doctor/ar-AANM01E?ocid=st
[4] GLAAD (2021). 2021 State of HIV Stigma Study. Retrieved online at https://www.glaad.org/endhivstigma
[5] Avery, Dan (2021, August 26). Half of Americans say they’d avoid an HIV-positive doctor. NBC News. Retrieved online at https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/half-of-americans-say-theyd-avoid-an-hiv-positive-doctor/ar-AANM01E?ocid=st
[6] McCrea, Megan (2020, April 25). How the Media Shapes Our Perception of HIV and AIDS. Healthline. Retrieved online at https://www.healthline.com/health/media-and-perception-of-hiv-aids 
[7] GLAAD (2021). 2021 State of HIV Stigma Study. Retrieved online at https://www.glaad.org/endhivstigma
[8] GLAAD (2021). 2021 State of HIV Stigma Study. Retrieved online at https://www.glaad.org/endhivstigma

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates. 

Could the Tide be Turning on HIV Criminalization Laws in the United States?

By: Brandon M. Macsata, CEO, ADAP Advocacy Association

The ongoing Covid-19 pandemic has revealed a longstanding truth well-known to the public health community, but often ignored by elected so-called 'leaders' and the general public. That is, public health is grossly underfunded in the United States. The federal share of public health expenditures dropped from 45% to 15% over 50 years.[1] Yet, rather than making the needed investments to address societal problems, or untreated cognitive and mental disabilities, or unfavorable social determinants of health, we leverage the vast criminal justice system to 'fix' them. There is probably no better example than the criminalization of HIV/AIDS in this country, dating back to the AIDS hysteria perpetrated by the late, bigoted Senator Jesse Helms. But evidence suggests that the tide is turning on these criminalization laws.

According to the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC), 37 states have HIV criminalization laws, including HIV-specific exposure laws, general communicable disease exposure laws (which could include HIV), and/or sentence enhancement laws specific to HIV. As of 2020, there were only 11 states with no specific criminalization laws.[2]

Starting in the 1990s, advances in medicine and the advent of the antiretroviral (ARV) therapies revolutionized the fight against HIV/AIDS; now, they are having a positive impact (pun intended) in the fight against HIV criminalization laws. The driving force behind it is Undetectable = Untransmittable, or U=U. In other words, a person living with HIV who is on treatment and has an undetectable viral load cannot transmit HIV through sex. According to the Prevention Access Campaign, "The science is clear. People living with HIV can feel confident that if they have an undetectable viral load and take their medications as prescribed, they cannot pass on HIV to sexual partners."[3]

Since 2014, several states have modernized their HIV criminalization laws - including California, Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, and North Carolina. With respect to these five states, CDC states: "Changes include removing HIV prevention issues from the criminal code and including them under disease control regulations, requiring intent to transmit, actual HIV transmission, or providing defenses for taking measures to prevent transmission such as viral suppression or being noninfectious, condom use, and partner PrEP use."[4]

Photo Source: Prevention Access Campaign

U=U has changed the HIV criminalization paradigm, evidenced by three more states turning the tide on these outdated laws. Joining the chorus for change are Illinois, Missouri, and Nevada. The following news reports provide an excellent analysis on the driving force behind the changes in each state:

• Pritzker Signs Bill Making Illinois Second State To Repeal HIV Criminalization
• Missouri Loosens Laws Criminalizing HIV Transmission After 30 Years Of 'Faulty Assumptions'
• Nevada Just Struck Down Its Outdated, Discriminatory Laws Criminalizing HIV Transmission

What is notable about Illinois, it represents only the second state to completely repeal its HIV criminalization law, following Texas' repeal back in 1994. “The repeal of the HIV criminal law in Illinois is a tribute to the work of state activists and organizers that made it happen, and a welcome advancement in the broader work to repeal these discriminatory laws across the nation,” said Jada Hicks, The Center for HIV Law & Policy’s Supervising Attorney for Criminal Justice Initiatives.[5]

Photo Source: Fine Art America

The criminal justice system shouldn't be used as a public health tool, because that isn't what it is designed to do. Broadly, some disability advocacy groups seeking to transform the system want to eliminate the criminalization of public health issues. 

In fact, Joshua D. Blecher-Cohen makes the case about disability law and criminalization in The Yale Law Journal, "HIV-specific criminal laws violate the Americans with Disabilities Act’s (ADA) ban on discrimination by public entities." We agree. In fact, there is a strong argument that such criminalization laws not only violate the ADA, but also the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. 

HIV criminalization laws don't curb the transmission of sexual transmitted infections, but they do promote HIV-related stigma. HIV criminalization laws don't save money, because they actually put taxpayers on the hook for more costs from unnecessary incarceration. HIV criminalization laws don't protect people, yet they do increase the spread of misinformation. People living with HIV/AIDS deserve equal protection under the law! HIV-negative people deserve a more honest approach to public health! And the United States deserves better!

[1] Haseltine, William A (2020, October 21). Underfunding Public Health Harms Americans Beyond Covid-19. Forbes. Retrieved online at https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/10/21/underfunding-public-health-harms-americans-beyond-covid-19/?sh=76b194a9419c#:~:text=Public%20health%20is%20consistently%20underfunded%20and%20often%20viewed,shorter%20lives%2C%20especially%20among%20those%20in%20lower-income%20brackets.

[2] Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (2020, December 21). HIV and STD Criminalization Laws. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Retrieved online at https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/law/states/exposure.html.

[3] Prevention Access Campaign (2021, February). Undetectable = Untransmittable. Retrieved online at https://www.preventionaccess.org/undetectable.

[4] Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (2020, December 21). HIV and STD Criminalization Laws. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Retrieved online at https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/law/states/exposure.html.

[5] The Center for HIV Law and Policy (2021, July 28). Illinois Becomes Second State to Repeal HIV Criminalization Laws. Retrieved online at https://www.hivlawandpolicy.org/news/illinois-becomes-second-state-repeal-hiv-criminalization-laws. 

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.

Making U=U Foundational in Our Efforts to End the HIV Epidemic

By: Murray Penner, U.S, Executive Director, Prevention Access Campaign/U=U

Undetectable = Untransmittable, or U=U, was created in July 2016, BY people living with HIV (along with leading researchers and other advocates), FOR people with HIV. The U=U campaign is approaching the fifth anniversary of its launch. As such, it is the perfect time to expand the U=U message with an advocacy focus on how U=U contributes to ending the HIV epidemic. 

Photo Source: Prevention Access Campaign

The medications people with HIV take to stay healthy also make it impossible for them to pass on HIV. That’s because when people are on effective HIV treatment, their HIV is suppressed in the body to such low levels that it’s undetectable by most lab tests. And when one’s viral load is undetectable, HIV also is not transmitted through sex. 

The U=U message is revolutionary and has a positive impact on people’s lives and on ending the epidemic:  

• U=U improves the well-being of people with HIV, transforming their social, sexual, and reproductive lives.
• U=U reduces the anxiety associated with HIV testing and adds an incentive for people with HIV to start and stay on treatment and in care. 
• U=U dismantles stigma on individual and community levels. 
• U=U provides a strong public health rationale for universal access to treatment, care, and support services. We refer to this as the U=U public health strategy.   

The U=U public health strategy is important to use in advocacy efforts. It works like this: When people with HIV have the treatment, care, and support services they need to stay undetectable, they remain healthy, and they cannot transmit HIV through sex. In other words, care and treatment is good for the personal health of people with HIV and good for the public health of the community. 

Photo Source: The Lancet

In a recent article in The Lancet, prominent U.S. leaders called for action to end the HIV epidemic. Among other strategies, it prioritizes the inclusion of U=U in efforts to end the HIV epidemic. 

One strategy in The Lancet article states that “Advocates should be equipped to use the so-called public health argument from U=U in advocacy to increase access and remove barriers to quality health care; ensuring people with HIV have the treatment and services they need to achieve and maintain an undetectable viral load. This not only saves lives, but also is an effective way to prevent new transmissions.” In keeping with this recommendation, PAC has created this U=U resource for use in advocacy efforts.As we continue our focus on ending the epidemic, advocacy is critical to make U=U a foundational strategy of our efforts. U=U is essential for the well-being and health of people with HIV. And it’s also critical for ending the epidemic, because U=U also prevents transmission. 

Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of NIAID at the NIH and chief medical advisor to President Joe Biden, says it best, stating that “U=U is the foundation of being able to end the HIV epidemic.”

Photo Source: NBC

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.

HIV/AIDS Fireside Chat Retreat in New Jersey / New York Tackles Pressing Issues

By: Brandon M. Macsata, CEO, ADAP Advocacy Association

The ADAP Advocacy Association hosted an HIV/AIDS "Fireside Chat" retreat in Weehawken, New Jersey among key stakeholder groups to discuss pertinent issues facing people living with HIV/AIDS. The Fireside Chat took place on Thursday, December 5th, and Friday, December 6th. U = U, Molecular HIV Surveillance, and Mental Health were evaluated by 20 diverse leaders in the fight against the HIV/AIDS epidemic.

Photo Source: Getty Images

The Fireside Chat included moderated white-board style discussion sessions on the following issues:

• U = U: A Foundation for Ending the HIV Epidemic — moderated by Murray Penner, Executive Director, North America, Prevention Access Campaign
• Ryan White Program: Is Molecular HIV Surveillance a Public Health Tool or Weapon to Fuel Stigma  — moderated by Brandon M. Macsata, CEO, ADAP Advocacy Association (planned facilitator was sick)
• Mental Health: Implications of Co-Occurring Diagnosis of a Mental Condition and HIV/AIDS  — moderated by Brandon M. Macsata, CEO, ADAP Advocacy Association (planned facilitator was sick)

The discussion sessions were designed to capture key observations, suggestions, and thoughts about how best to address the challenges being discussed at the Fireside Chat. The following represents the attendees:

• Tez Anderson, Founder, Let's Kick ASS (AIDS Survivor Syndrome)
• Guy Anthony, Founder, Black, Gifted & Whole
• William E. Arnold, President & CEO, Community Access National Network (CANN)
• Robert Breining, spokesperson, Positively Fearless
• Patricia Charleston, Program Supervisor, Gaudenzia, Inc.
• Jeffrey S. Crowley, Distinguished Scholar & Program Director at the Infectious Disease Initiatives, O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown Law
• Hilary Hansen, Executive Director, US Patient Advocacy & Strategic Alliances, Merck
• Catherine Hanssens, Founding Executive Director, The Center for HIV Law and Policy
• Ben Kelly, VP Operations, Maxor National Pharmacy Services
• Scott Kramer, President & Psychotherapist, Affirming Psychotherapy LCSW PC
• Jen Laws, policy consultant
• Vickie Lynn, Visiting Instructor, USF
• Brandon M. Macsata, CEO, ADAP Advocacy Association
• Julie Marston, Executive Director, Community Research Initiative of New England, Inc.
• Ann-Margaret Navarra, Faculty - Assistant Professor, NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing
• Stephen Novis, Director, Government Relations, ViiV Healthcare
• Murray Penner, Executive Director, North America, Prevention Access Campaign
• Alan Richardson, Executive Vice President of Strategic Patient Solutions, Patient Advocate Foundation
• Lee Storrow, Executive Director, North Carolina AIDS Action Network (NCAAN)
• Marcus Wilson, National Policy & Advocacy Director, Johnson & Johnson

The ADAP Advocacy Association is pleased to share the following brief recap of the Fireside Chat.

Undetectable = Untransmittable:

Murray Penner provided a basic overview on the science behind "undetectable equals untransmittable" ("U=U"), which is clear and indisputable. Treatment as prevention dates back to the 1990s, including preventing mother-to-child transmission. According to Penner, there have been four large international studies that have demonstrated U=U is sound public health policy.

According to Penner: "Four major scientific studies have proven that HIV-positive individuals who have an undetectable viral load and stay on their medications do not transmit the virus to sexual partners. The findings were initially announced in 2008 with the Swiss Statement, and they were confirmed again in 2016. For many people diagnosed with the virus, the news is nothing short of life-changing. Diagnosis doesn’t mean no more satisfying relationships. And that lifts people out of depression. They feel like they can be intimate and free in their sexual relations, and that’s at the heart of it.”

It was noted that U=U has been endorsed by the World Health Organization ("WHO"), as well as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention ("CDC"). The foundation of U=U includes treatment, labs, and connection to care (or "TLC"), and it provides the public health argument for the U=U campaign.

The discussion also focused on the role of providers in educating patients and the general community, as well as how best to communicate the U=U message. There was also some conversation about how the messaging needs to adapt to address diverse communities. The group agreed more needed to be done to use U=U to change the outdated HIV Criminalization laws.

The following materials were shared with retreat attendees:

• Providers Should Discuss U=U with all Patients Living with HIV
• HIVMA Pocket Guide for Providers 
• CDC Letter Approving U=U 
• U=U Basic Fact Sheet – October 2019
• Basic Fact sheet from FHI 360 
• Video: Chloe Orkin is past-chair of the British HIV Association and Gareth Thomas is a rugby player in the U.K. (from Wales) 
• Resources from Prevention Access Campaign (U=U)

The ADAP Advocacy Association would like to publicly acknowledge and thank Murray for facilitating this important discussion.

Molecular HIV Surveillance:

Molecular HIV surveillance involves data collection and sharing between healthcare practitioners and public health departments to track individual treatment resistance, as well as trends in HIV infections. It also leverages cluster detection to identify new infections.

The discussion included an overview on healthcare & privacy rights, which fuel many of the concerns expressed by patients, advocacy groups, and some leading civil rights organizations. Background context included HIV-related stigma, dating back to early 1980s to current times; it also touched on HIV-related criminalization.

Weighing the pros and cons of this took was at the center of the debate on the issue. Whereas it is favored by Health Departments and some public health advocates, there remains considerable push-back from the community. There is no informed consent by patients for data collected using individuals’ blood samples. State and local health departments report de-identified data to the CDC, but there are obvious patient privacy concerns.

HIV Criminalization occupied a lot of the group's time during the discussion. Draconian HIV-specific criminalization laws still exist in 34 states; another 24 states have used general criminal statutes against people living with HIV for “HIV exposure” or non-disclosure of HIV status (CHLP, 2019). These laws relegate people living with HIV to second-class citizenship for numerous reasons. According to the Center for HIV Law and Policy, state HIV criminalization laws “criminalize non-disclosure of HIV status or exposure of a third party to HIV; make exceptions to confidentiality and privacy rights of people living with HIV; provide for sentence enhancements for people living with HIV convicted of underlying crimes such as prostitution and solicitation; and require sex offender registration for people living with HIV” (CHLP, 2019).

The following materials were shared with retreat attendees:

• Molecular HIV surveillance: public health tool or weapon?

Jeffrey R. Lewis, President & CEO of the Legacy Health Endowment, was suppose to facilitate this discussion on Molecular HIV Surveillance but he was unable to attend due to illness. The ADAP Advocacy Association thanks him, nonetheless.

Mental Health:

Mental health and its intersection with HIV/AIDS included important statistics about both health issues in the United States. Research has found considerable overlap between many mental health disorders and HIV infection. Individuals who are receiving care for a mental health condition are four times as likely to be living with HIV compared to the general population, according to a multisite study of the prevalence of HIV with rapid testing in mental health settings.

Increasingly, it is an emerging issue among an aging population living with HIV/AIDS as it has become a chronic disease. As of 2015, over half of the 1.6 million individuals with HIV/AIDS are  50 years, or older. The discussion presented an excellent opportunity to discuss AIDS Survivor Syndrome, which is the term coined by Tea Anderson to describe the “spectrum of sustained trauma survivorship resulting from living through the AIDS pandemic.”

An important tool to address the unmet needs is targeted case management under Medicaid, although not widely utilized for individuals living with HIV/AIDS. Assertive community treatment is an intensive and highly integrated approach for community mental health service delivery. Four states have taken this approach to address the needs of the HIV community.

Once again, HIV Criminalization was discussed because it is linked to numerous mental health conditions among individuals living with HIV/AIDS. According to the CDC's Medical Monitoring Project, four in five HIV-positive patients report feeling internalized HIV-related stigma; two in three say that it is difficult to tell others about their HIV infection; one in three report feeling guilty or ashamed of their HIV status; and one in four say that being HIV-positive makes them feel dirty or worthless (CDC, 2018).

The following materials were shared with retreat attendees:

• Implications of Co-Occurring Diagnosis of a Mental Condition and HIV/AIDS
• MENTAL HEALTH INFOGRAPHIC #1: Implications of Co-Occurring Diagnosis of a Mental Condition and HIV/AIDS (August 2019)
• AIDS Survivor Syndrome & Understanding the Linkages between Mental Health and HIV/AIDS
• MENTAL HEALTH INFOGRAPHIC #2: Implications of Co-Occurring Diagnosis of Depression and HIV/AIDS
• Implications of Health Stigma, Mental Health and HIV/AIDS
• MENTAL HEALTH INFOGRAPHIC #3: Implications of Health Stigma, Mental Health & HIV/AIDS

John Williamson, candidate for Masters in Social Work at Fordham University, was suppose to facilitate this discussion on Mental Health but he was unable to attend due to illness. The ADAP Advocacy Association thanks him, nonetheless.

Additional Fireside Chats are planned in 2020.

References:

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Medical Monitoring Project. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/systems/mmp/resources.html#Fact%20Sheets,%20
• Center for HIV Law and Policy (March 2019). HIV Criminalization in the United States: A Sourcebook on State and Federal HIV Criminal Law and Practice (Third Edition). Retrieved online at http://www.hivlawandpolicy.org/sourcebook. 

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.

U=U – A Foundation for Ending the HIV Epidemic

By: Murray Penner, Executive Director, North America, Prevention Access Campaign

What many have thought for nearly 20 years is now an undeniable fact:  People living with HIV (PLWH) on effective treatment cannot transmit the virus to their sexual partners. This is the basis for Undetectable = Untransmittable, or U=U. You may know it, but in the United States, many PLWH, providers, policy makers, and the general public still don’t. This fact can transform lives and the field when communicated properly and represents a significant opportunity to help end the HIV epidemic.

There is an abundance of research supporting U=U, including PARTNER 1, in which both straight and gay couples had more than 58,000 condomless sex acts and PARTNER 2, in which gay male couples had more than 77,000 condomless sex acts. Both studies had zero linked HIV transmissions. Other research includes the Rakai, HPTN 052, and Opposites Attract studies, as well as the Swiss Statement that first published information about the risk of transmission being zero in 2008. This and other evidence is discussed in an online article at www.i-base.info/htb/32308.

Prevention Access Campaign (PAC) launched the U=U campaign through its consensus statement in July of 2016 and within three short years has achieved support from nearly 900 organizations in 98 countries. PAC is a community of people living with HIV, researchers, organizations, and other allies who share the common goals to end the dual epidemics of HIV and HIV-related stigma by empowering people with accurate and meaningful information.

Sharing the U=U message provides an unprecedented opportunity to improve the lives of people living with HIV and to dismantle HIV stigma. It has far-reaching public health implications for engagement across each stage of the treatment cascade and for expanding access to universal treatment and care to all people living with HIV so that they can benefit from viral suppression.
The basics rules of U=U are not complex.  It's about TLC:

1. Treatment – stay on Treatment as prescribed 
2. Labs – get Labs done regularly 
3. Connection – stay Connected to Care 

Words matter. In conveying the message that U=U, it is critical to be clear and definitive, which inspires confidence and doesn’t promote unnecessary doubts or fear. PAC recommends using easy to understand phrases such as “can’t pass it on,” “cannot transmit,” and “no risk." You can even say “zero risk.” Avoid phrases that may suggest even a slight risk like “nearly impossible,” “extremely low, “essentially no,” and “virtually impossible.” Any perceived window of risk, no matter how slight, may be considered “still a risk.” If you hear or see such ambiguous phrases being used, please speak out!

The U=U message is not copyrighted.  It belongs to everyone and is based on the science of treatment as prevention, pioneered in 2007 by Dr. Julio Montaner, who was also one of the earliest signatories to the U=U consensus statement. The phrase “Undetectable = Untransmittable (U=U)” was created by the community and researchers to easily convey the TasP science in a more definitive and empowering way.

As you create statements, videos, speeches, and/or newsletters, please keep in mind that millions of people don’t know about or believe U=U. Every communication is an opportunity for change. Make the information prominent so it has the best chance of being seen, not buried or near the end of a video where it could go unnoticed. U=U can be utilized in many messages:

• HIV stigma – U=U is the greatest opportunity we’ve had to dismantle it. 
• HIV treatment – U=U is an added incentive to start and adhere to treatment & to stay engaged in care. 
• Sexual and reproductive health – U=U means PLWH can have sex and conceive children without fear of transmission or alternative and expensive means of insemination. 
• Mental health – U=U reduces the fear and shame of transmission which has lifted people with HIV out of depression and social isolation. 
• HIV prevention – An undetectable HIV viral load only prevents HIV transmission to sexual partners. PrEP for HIV-negative individuals also prevents it. But these HIV-prevention tools do not prevent STIs and pregnancy. Using condoms helps prevent HIV transmission as well as other STIs and pregnancy. Choices for prevention methods may be different depending upon a person’s sexual practices, circumstances and relationships. For instance, if someone is having sex with multiple partners or is in a non-monogamous relationship, they might consider using condoms to prevent other STIs, while two individuals in a monogamous, sero-different relationship may choose U=U.
• Access to treatment and services – U=U is the public health argument for access. Everyone deserves to benefit from treatment. But people who do not achieve viral suppression must not be shamed or stigmatized either. Structural inequalities and social determinants of health make it difficult or impossible for far too many to reach viral suppression.   
• HIV criminalization – U=U is an important part of the modernization toolbox. 

Other items to keep in mind:

• Undetectable, synonymous with viral suppression, is under 200 copies/ml. 
• Achieving an undetectable viral load can take several months of ART. Once achieved, continued adherence is required. 
• U=U only applies to sexual transmission; there is not yet evidence about breastfeeding or needle sharing, although the U=U message should still be considered. 
• U=U may not exempt people with HIV from disclosure laws, which are unjust and bad for public health regardless of viral load. 

For more information on U=U or the Prevention Access Campaign, visit www.uequalsu.org.



Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.