Long-Acting Injectable Agents Continue to Reshape the HIV Care Continuum

By: Ranier Simons, ADAP Blog Guest Contributor

Long-acting injectable (LAI) agents remain at the forefront of medical innovation, especially regarding HIV treatment and prevention. LAIs are significant because they increase access options for people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) for treatment, opening pathways for sustained viral suppression. LAIs are a solution for PLWHA who experience challenges adhering to daily oral antiretrovirals. Taking pills daily is unduly mentally burdensome as a reminder of living with HIV/AIDS; some patients cannot take daily pills due to stigma and living in an unsafe environment, and many deal with housing instability or travel frequently (New Vision, 2025). Updated study results and other recent developments solidify the efficacy and promise of LAIs as the future of treatment and prevention.

Photo Source: EATG

Cabenuva (cabotegravir plus rilpivirine), approved in January 2021, is the first and only complete long-acting injectable and two-drug regimen available for HIV treatment. Initially, it was approved for monthly injection, then expanded to bi-monthly dosing (Haelle, 2025). However, Cabenuva was developed for PLWHA who have already achieved viral suppression before starting use. Ongoing research has been investigating the efficacy of Cabenuva for PLWHA with detectable viral loads, known as viremia. 

A recent study led by Ricky Hsu, MD, of NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City, indicates Cabenuva would also be effective for widespread use for PLWHA with viremia (Haelle, 2025). The study group consisted of patients selected from the Observational Pharmaco-Epidemiology Research & Analysis (OPERA) cohort. OPERA includes over 150,000 PLWHA. Among the eligible subjects who were U.S. residents, eighty-eight percent achieved viral suppression. PLWHA with viremia on oral medication need options to facilitate reaching viral suppression, and the study shows the promise of future widespread indications for LAIs to achieve that goal (Haelle, 2025). 

Moreover, the final results of the CARES study on LAI antiretroviral therapy in Africa, released in March of this year at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in San Francisco, further support the efficacy of LAIs. The results were so promising that the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its guidelines to inform that virally suppressed PLWHA on oral medications may switch to Cabenuva because it is equivalent (New Vision, 2025). As future studies confirm the widespread use for PLWHA with viremia, the goal would be for the WHO to add this to its guidelines.

Photo Source: European Pharmaceutical Review

While very effective, Cabenuva must be administered in a medical office setting, as it is given through intramuscular injection. The requirement of travel to a clinic setting is a potential barrier for PLWHA, particularly those with transportation challenges, especially if they do not live near a conveniently located facility. A study led by Eric Meissner, M.D., Ph.D., at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) examined the possibility of LAI injections in a home setting (MUSC, 2025). The project gave thirty-three participants the option to receive injections in a clinic setting or at home. Eighteen chose the home setting.

In the home setting, eighteen PLWHA were visited by licensed practical nurses (LPNs) who gave the injections. Meissner’s group arranged for pharmacies to mail LAIs to patients, along with instructions to store the medication in their refrigerators until LPN arrival. Patients were highly satisfied, indicating that home administration is a plausible way to enhance patient adherence. Home injections would be more challenging on a widespread level, given the logistics necessary to coordinate pharmacy with staffing LPNs to visit homes (MUSC, 2025). Moreover, insurance does not reimburse for the staff coordination of pharmacy and nurse visits. Making home LAI administration commonplace would require innovation of funding infrastructure as well as staffing solutions.

Photo Source: Tu Salud

Cabenuva is a beneficial first step in the widespread use of LAIs for HIV treatment; however, it is not universally appropriate. Some PLWHA cannot use Cabenuva because they have resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). The rilpivirine component of Cabenuva is an NRRTI (Haelle, 2025). One possible solution is the use of lenacapavir (Sunlenca) in addition to Cabenuva. Sunlenca is a semi-annual LAI used for people on oral antiretroviral treatment who have multiple-drug resistance issues. However, the future of long-acting agents should also include other options, such as those that are oral. One option under study is a weekly dosage of an oral combination of islatravir, a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor, and lenacapavir (Haelle, 2024).

Eliminating HIV has required and will continue to require multiple tools of treatment. Current utilization of LAIs will lead to the development of new injectables and non-injectable long-acting agents. The variety of available therapies needs to keep up with the increasing variance in the characteristics of PLWHA in need of treatment. Continued research and funding innovation will be necessary to ensure the rapid growth of LAIs, and other non-injectable long-acting agents continues.

[1] Haelle, T. (2024, March 11). Once-Weekly ART Showed Similar Efficacy for HIV as Daily ART. Retrieved from https://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/croi/109111

[2] Haelle, T. (2025, August 4). The Future of ART Regimens for HIV Is in Long-Acting Agents. Retrieved from https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/the-future-of-art-regimens-for-hiv-is-in-long-acting-agents/ar-AA1JTX8S?ocid=socialshare

[3] New Vision. (2025, August 6). Long-acting injectable HIV treatment as effective as daily oral pill — study. Retrieved from https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/long-acting-injectable-hiv-treatment-as-effective-as-daily-oral-pill-study/ar-AA1K4slS?ocid=socialshare

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.   

State Payors Make Advancements in Coverage of HIV Long-Acting Injectable Treatments

By: Marcus J. Hopkins, ADAP 340B Consultant

As of June 2025, 47 state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs) and all state Medicaid programs offer coverage for Cabenuva (cabotegravir; rilpivirine), a long-acting injectable (LAI) for the treatment of HIV/AIDS. This represents a significant change from 2023, when ADAP Advocacy found that just 40 state ADAP and 39 state Medicaid programs offered coverage for Cabenuva.

According to the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors (NASTAD), only four state ADAP programs—Louisiana, Missouri, South Dakota, and Texas—do not currently offer coverage for Cabenuva. However, last month the Texas Legislature approved $338 billion two-year spending plan with funds to support Long-Acting Injectables (LAIs) for the Texas AIDS Drug Assistance Program (Figure 1).

Figure 1 – Long-Acting Injectable Coverage Map – Cabenuva – ADAP Coverage by State, June 2025

In addition to 47 state ADAPs offering coverage for Cabenuva, all state Medicaid programs currently provide coverage through either their fee-for-service Medicaid program or one of their Managed Care Organizations (MCOs; Figure 2). Medicaid coverage of Cabenuva, along with coverage provided by commercial insurance plans, is more difficult to quantify, as many plans may include coverage as a medical benefit rather than a pharmacy benefit. Finding information about drugs covered as medical benefits often requires searching through dozens, if not hundreds, of plan documents.

This was the case when researching Medicaid Preferred Drug Lists (PDLs). When ADAP Advocacy was unable to find direct confirmation of coverage for Cabenuva, it relied upon Long-Acting Agent Resource Center’s Cabenuva Coverage Map, a project of the American Academy of HIV Medicine (https://hivlaa.org/map/), to provide coverage information. Coverage information for the following 11 states was gleaned using this resource: Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Montana, Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.

Figure 2 – Long-Acting Injectable Coverage Map – Cabenuva – Medicaid Coverage by State, June 2025

ADAP Advocacy, under the direction of its 13-member ADAP Long-Acting Injectables Patient Advisory Committee, first began tracking ADAP and Medicaid coverage of Cabenuva, along with other LAIs to prevent or treat HIV in 2023 (Hopkins, 2023), when it was discovered that several state Medicaid programs were offering coverage of Cabenuva—first approved for monthly treatment in 2021, with a secondary approval for bi-monthly injections in 2022 (ViiV Healthcare, 2022)—in name only, with many states placing virtually insurmountable prior authorization (PA) requirements between patients and their life-saving medications. The formulary research into drug coverage and PA requirements led ADAP Advocacy to conduct original quantitative and qualitative patient-side research on sentiments and attitudes toward long-acting agents.

Key findings from ADAP Advocacy's research include:

• The majority of respondents to the Treatment Survey (52.3%) indicated that they would prefer receiving LAI medication to treat their HIV over a daily pill-based regimen; In the Prevention Survey, the majority of respondents (71.4%) indicated they would prefer an LAI over a daily pill-based regimen to prevent HIV.
• The vast majority of respondents to the Treatment Survey (87.8%) indicated being aware of Cabenuva as an LAI to treat HIV. Of those respondents who learned about the existence of LAI medications through this survey, half (50%) reported being open to discussing them with a medical provider; Just over half of respondents to the Prevention Survey (58.4%) indicated being aware of Apretude for use as LAI PrEP. More than four out of every ten respondents (42.2%) who learned about the existence of Apretude through this survey reported being open to discussing it with a medical provider;
• A majority of respondents to the Treatment Survey (87.7%) indicated having no issues finding information about LAI medications. Of those respondents who did have trouble finding information (12.3%), most respondents had trouble finding information about insurance coverage (78.6%), prior authorization requirements (78.6%), and the cost they would have to pay to access LAIs (71.4%);
• Insurance coverage barriers impacted respondents’ ability to pursue LAIs, with more than 1 in 4 survey respondents (27%) reporting this barrier in the Treatment and Prevention surveys. In the case of PrEP, a majority of those experiencing this (66%) indicated that the barriers to access were so cumbersome that they decided Apretude was not right for them.

In addition to coverage for Cabenuva, ADAP Advocacy also found that:

• 2 state ADAP programs (MA & MN) and 40 state Medicaid programs offer coverage for Apretude as Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP);
• 43 state ADAP and 42 state Medicaid programs provide coverage for Sunlenca as HIV salvage therapy; and,
• 50 state ADAP and 32 state Medicaid programs provide coverage for Trogarzo as HIV salvage therapy.

Coverage for LAI drugs is of ever-increasing importance for People Living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) as long-acting agents may help to increase medication adherence and reduce the risk of creating multi-drug-resistant strains of the HIV virus. ADAP Advocacy will continue to monitor coverage of LAIs and provide updates when significant changes are made.

[1] Hopkins, M. J. (2023, July 20). The state of long-acting injectable Medicaid coverage. Nags Head, NC: ADAP Advocacy. https://adapadvocacyassociation.blogspot.com/2023/07/the-state-of-long-acting-injectable.html

[2] ViiV Healthcare. (2022, January). ViiV Healthcare announces US FDA approval of Cabenuva (cabotegravir, rilpivirine) for use every two months, expanding the label of the first and only complete long-acting HIV treatment. https://viivhealthcare.com/hiv-news-and-media/news/press-releases/2022/january/viiv-healthcare-announces-fda-approval-of-cabenuva-for-use-every-two-months/

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.    

Drug Shortages Growing, but Spares HIV-related Injectable Therapies

By: Ranier Simons, ADAP Blog Guest Contributor

Periodic shortages of all kinds of products are common. The height of the coronavirus pandemic even created a widespread shortage of toilet paper, Lysol, and baby formula. At times, drug shortages are also not uncommon. Nevertheless, drug shortages have been a trending topic in the media. The heightened discourse is atypical for so many drugs to be experiencing shortages simultaneously. Not only are there many drugs in shortage, but they have been in scarcity for a long time. Moreover, some of the drugs in shortage treat life-threatening conditions. Now shortages appear to be impacting injectable therapies.

Photo Source: Forbes

Drug shortages have increased over time, with the end of 2023 being the highest in the past ten years. At the end of 2025, according to the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), 125 drugs were in shortage status. Some of the drugs were new to the shortage list. However, many have been in shortage status for years. Furthermore, the duration of shortage status has also been increasing. In 2023, the average shortage was about three years compared to a duration of two years in 2020.[1] Unfortunately, at 2023 year-end, about a quarter of the drugs on the list had been in shortage for approximately five years, and treatments such as epinephrine injections had been in shortage for over ten years.[1,2]

Drug shortages affect all aspects of healthcare. No one therapeutic class is disproportionately harmed. Clinicians are frustrated because shortages of life-saving medications endanger many living with life-threatening conditions. Complete outages of supply mean that some patients must suffer through dangerous delays in care. In other cases, doctors must switch regimens completely due to shortages, forcing them to use medications they do not feel are the best options for patients. This results in using less efficacious medications with poorer desired outcomes and undesirable side effects. Additionally, when shortages result in switching from a regimen in progress, there is a danger of the body becoming unresponsive to the original regimen when the shortage is resolved.

A myriad of issues create drug shortages. Some of those issues are economic, supply and demand, and even manufacturing quality problems. Shortages are more common with lower-priced drugs such as generics.[3] A prescription for most of the injectables and solid oral medications in shortage costs less than five dollars to produce.[1,2] This translates into meager manufacturer profit margins, especially with wholesalers and purchasing groups driving down pricing. Thus, manufacturers are not incentivized to produce those medications in sustained large quantities. The FDA cannot force a company to make a particular medication, even if it is needed.

Photo Source: FDA

Supply and demand issues also drive shortages. In some cases, demand outpaces supply when drugs are used for expanded use cases. This is the case for drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy, which are GLP-1 drugs whose primary indications are to treat diabetes. The discovery of its effectiveness in weight loss has resulted in a vastly increased demand. The demand driven by the population of those dependent upon GLP-1 drugs to manage diabetic conditions in combination with those using them for weight loss has driven outages as well as increased pricing. Some of the demand for other drugs is driven by increases in prescriptions due to telemedicine. During the pandemic, restrictions were lifted on the prescribing of certain classes of medicines via telemedicine, such as Adderall, which is used for ADHD.[4] This resulted in increased demand for the drug which contributed to shortages that are still seen presently. This is especially pertinent since some obtain Adderall and other medications online for purposes of substance abuse.

Manufacturing problems and supply chain issues strongly contribute to drug shortages as well. The U.S. is dependent upon sources outside of the country for many of the drugs in shortage status. Less than one-quarter of the oral generics used in the U.S., and about 40 percent of sterile injectable generics are manufactured domestically. Approximately 17% of injectables used in the U.S. are manufactured in China.[5] Most importantly, many of the raw ingredients for pharmaceuticals are sourced outside of the U.S., with materials for 90-95 percent of U.S. generic injectable drugs coming from China and India.[5,6] Manufacturing certain older generic drugs, especially sterile injectables, is difficult due to the sterile manufacturing conditions required; thus, the number of capable facilities is low.

About 53 percent of the newest drug shortages are generic injectable medicines.[7] Sterile injectables include normal saline, antibiotics, flu vaccines, chemotherapy drugs, morphine, and insulin. Shortages in chemotherapy drugs have caused doctors and hospitals to resort to drug rationing. In those instances, hard decisions must be made regarding the treatment of life-threatening cancers. Doctors must choose which patients receive certain medications based on decisions based on curative intent and probability versus overall survival.

Photo Source: ADAP Advocacy

Drug shortages were also of heightened concern for those living with HIV during the coronavirus pandemic. In March 2020, ADAP Advocacy received assurances directly from each drug manufacturer that the coronavirus pandemic wasn’t negatively impacting the availability of anti-retroviral medications. The pharmaceutical industry was applauded for its efforts to protect the anti-retroviral drug supply chain.[8] At that time all of the drug manufacturers – AbbVie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Merck. Theratechnologies, and ViiV Healthcare – did not foresee disruption to their supply chain.

Considering injectable therapies are increasingly showing up on the FDA’s drug shortage list, ADAP Advocacy once again inquired with its industry partners about potential concerns over shortages of injectable HIV-related medications, such as the injectables Cabenuva for the treatment of HIV, and Sunlenca for the prevention of HIV. 

Reaching out to the industry resulted in very positive feedback. A representative from ViiV Healthcare stated that “there are no current shortages nor anticipation of any prolonged shortages of any injectable within the ViiV portfolio.”

A Gilead spokesperson likewise stated, “Gilead’s commercial supply chain is robust, and we have a strong inventory position. We continually monitor the forecast and actively manage supply; thus, we do not anticipate any supply concerns related to Sunlenca®, Gilead’s twice-yearly injectable HIV treatment option for people living with the virus who are heavily treatment-experienced with multi-drug resistant HIV. We are committed to person-centric HIV treatment research and development, ensuring our advances in biomedical innovation reach the wide range of individuals and communities who are most in need.” 

Drug shortage is a serious concern that will require a multi-pronged approach to solve. The White House, FDA, and others must find solutions to the manufacturing, regulatory, and supply chain challenges. The government is already looking into investing in some of the raw materials needed for drug creation, which is a good start.

[1] Lokuwithana, D. (2024, June 15). U.S. drug shortages worsen to reach a decade high: report. Retrieved from https://seekingalpha.com/news/4116477-us-drug-shortages-reach-decade-high

[2] Silverman, E. (2024, June 4). U.S. drug shortages have reached a decade high and are lasting longer, too. Retrieved from https://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2024/06/04/shortages-medicines-drugs-hospitals-manufacturing-cancer-adhd-gpo/

[3] IQVIA. (2023, November 15). Drug shortages in the U.S. 2023. Retrieved from https://www.iqvia.com/insights/the-iqvia-institute/reports-and-publications/reports/drug-shortages-in-the-us-2023

[4] Gilbert, D., Amenabar, T. (2023, March 14). An Adderall shortage has not let up. Here is why. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/03/14/adderall-shortage-telehealth-prescriptions/

[5] Owens, C. (2024, January 5). Low prices are contributing to America's drug shortage problem. Retrieved from https://www.axios.com/2024/01/05/america-generic-drug-shortage-reasons

[6] United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (2023, March). Short Supply: The Health and National Security Risks of Drug Shortages. Retrieved from https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023-06-06-HSGAC-Majority-Draft-Drug-Shortages-Report.-FINAL-CORRECTED.pdf

[7] U.S. Pharmocopeia. (2024, June). USP Annual Drug Shortages Report. Retrieved from https://go.usp.org/l/323321/2024-05-31/92zsjg/323321/1717187146zgOpt4vW/GEA_GC_056R_MSM_Report_2024_05_FINAL.pdf?_gl=1*e6c4sj*_gcl_au*Mjc1NzUzOTg5LjE3MTc1MTMzOTM.*_ga*OTI0OTQ1ODI4LjE3MTc1MTMzOTM.*_ga_DTGQ04CR27*MTcxNzUxMzM5My4xLjEuMTcxNzUxMzc1Ny4wLjAuMA

[8] ADAP Advocacy. (2020, March 26). Press Release: ADAP Advocacy Association Applauds Pharmaceutical Industry Efforts on Protecting the Drug Supply Chain during the Coronavirus Pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.adapadvocacy.org/pdf-docs/2020_ADAP_Press_COVID_19_Supply_Chain_03-26-20.pdf

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.  

The State of Long-Acting Injectable Medicaid Coverage

By: Marcus J. Hopkins, ADAP Blog Guest Contributor, and Founder & Executive Director of the Appalachian Learning Initiative (APPLI)

A review of state Medicaid programs has revealed that coverage of recently approved Long-Acting Injectable (LAI) drugs used for the treatment of HIV is mixed, with several key states making access to these drugs difficult for patients. Currently, such products include Cabenuva (cabotegravir; rilpivirine| ViiV Healthcare), Sunlenca (lenacapavir | Gilead Sciences), and Trogarzo (ibalizumab | Theratechnologies).

Cabenuva received full approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2021 and is used to treat patients who have already proven to be adherent to daily pill regimens and have achieved undetectable viral suppression, meaning that they have fewer than 50 copies of the HIV virus per milliliter of blood. Cabenuva is a series of two injections (200mg cabotegravir; 200mg rilpivirine) administered to patients by a healthcare provider once every month or every other month.

Sunlenca is a salvage therapy—a treatment option utilized in patients who have multi-drug-resistant strains of HIV or who have experienced drug toxicity—that is administered twice a year and used in combination with other antiretroviral drugs.

Trogarzo is also a salvage therapy — a long-acting monoclonal antibody which binds to domain 2 of the CD4 T cell receptors. The drug is approved, in combination with other antiretrovirals, for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug resistant (MDR) HIV-1 infection failing their current antiretroviral regimen.

The FDA approval of LAIs presents Persons Living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) with one of the most exciting opportunities to ever occur in the HIV treatment landscape: the chance to remain undetectable without having to remember to stop every day to take your HIV medications. Cabenuva is specifically designed for patients who have a proven track record of medication adherence, and the prospect of having to treat your HIV only once every month or every other month is both appealing and revolutionary—a sea change in a treatment landscape that has all too often been beset by horrific, painful, disfiguring, and/or sickening side effects and short medication half-lives that placed patients at risk of developing multi-drug-resistant strains of HIV after missing even a single dose.

LAIs still face several barriers they must overcome before they become the first-line standard of care, including (but not limited to) provider and patient awareness and acceptance of the regimens, payor Prior Authorization limits, and the requirement that the drugs be administered by clinicians rather than by patients, themselves. The latter barrier makes prescribing LAIs in rural and remote areas a difficult proposition, as patients in those regions often face their own barriers to accessing care and treatment, including geographic, transportation, and financial barriers.

The new review of state Medicaid programs in the United States found that 38 states provide coverage for Cabenuva, of which 20 states list it as a Preferred Drug, 7 as a Non-Preferred Drug, and 13 have Prior Authorization requirements restricting access to the drug. 13 states Medicaid Programs—AR, CO, DE, GA, IN, IA, KS, KY, MT, NE, SC, TN, WI—offer either no coverage or list the drug as non-formulary (Figure 1).

Figure 1 – State Medicaid Preferred Drug List Coverage of Cabenuva, July 2023

State Medicaid program coverage of Sunlenca is less robust, which is to be expected given that the drug only received FDA approval in January 2023. 30 states currently offer coverage for Sunlenca, of which 23 states list the drug as a Preferred Drug, 7 as a Non-Preferred Drug. 21 states offer either no coverage or list the drug as Non-Formulary (Figure 2).

Figure 2 – State Medicaid Preferred Drug List Coverage of Sunlenca, July 2023

State Medicaid program coverage of Trogarzo is even less robust. 30 states currently offer coverage for Trogarzo, of which 22 states list the drug as a Preferred Drug and 8 as a Non-Preferred Drug. 21 states offer either no coverage or list the drug as Non-Formulary (Figure 3).

Figure 3 – State Medicaid Preferred Drug List Coverage of Trogarzo, July 2023

Several states have restrictions against prescribing Cabenuva as a treatment regimen, including Delaware, which requires failure with two Preferred Agents before Prior Authorization requests will be approved, and Wisconsin, in which both Cabenuva and Sunlenca are considered “Non-Formulary” (Table 1).

This review of Medicaid PDL coverage was initiated after receiving a report from Positive Health Clinic in Morgantown, WV, that West Virginia’s state Medicaid program was denying virtually all prescriptions for Cabenuva. A Patient Care Navigator reported that West Virginia’s Medicaid program has essentially classified the drug as a salvage therapy through its Prior Authorization requirements.

To date, Positive Health Clinic has had all new prescriptions denied by the state’s Medical Director, even after multiple appeals and conversations with state Medicaid officials. Those appeals included copies of the FDA approval and treatment indication, highlighting that the state has misclassified the drug.

The one exception has been an approval as a result of medication continuation. A patient who moved to West Virginia from Pennsylvania and was already prescribed the regimen. In order to get their prescription approved, Positive Health Clinic had to submit multiple forms of proof that the patient was fit to continue therapy, including:

1. An active prescription for the drug
2. Evidence that the patient was 100% compliant with receiving each dose
3. Proof that the patient would continue to remain compliant.

We reviewed West Virginia’s state Medicaid PDL and Cabenuva Prior Authorization form in order to confirm this report and found the following guidance:

Cabenuva requires review by the Medical Director and is available only on appeal. Medical reasoning beyond convenience or enhanced compliance over preferred agents must be provided.

This approval guidance exists in direct opposition to the FDA’s approval and treatment indication guidance:

CABENUVA, a 2-drug co-packaged product of cabotegravir, a human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI), and rilpivirine, an HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is indicated as a complete regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults to replace the current antiretroviral regimen in those who are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) on a stable antiretroviral regimen with no history of treatment failure and with no known or suspected resistance to either cabotegravir or rilpivirine.

While Prior Authorization requirements for new (and often expensive) therapeutic drugs are not uncommon, the West Virginia Medicaid program’s blanket preemptive denial of a highly effective and proven HIV therapy appears to be an attempt to staunch what they believe will be an influx of prescriptions for an expensive drug. This approach is likely a response to increased efforts on the part of HIV and Harm Reduction advocates to utilize Cabenuva as the go-to therapy in West Virginia’s hard-to-reach, hard-to-treat patient populations.

Since 2018, West Virginia has endured two concurrent, unrelated (according to molecular surveillance), and unabated HIV outbreaks in Cabell and Kanawha Counties. These outbreaks, for which the state has received very limited funds from federal agencies to combat, have occurred primarily in populations of Persons Who Inject Drugs (PWIDs)—populations that are notoriously difficult to reach, treat, and retain in care.

Prior to 2018, West Virginia saw an annual average of just 67 new HIV diagnoses. Beginning in 2018, the state began seeing significant increases in new diagnoses, more than half of which were directly related to Injection Drug Use. This outbreak of new diagnoses among PWIDs was further exacerbated by the state’s increasing hostility toward comprehensive harm reduction measures, specifically Syringe Services Programs (SSPs). Even in 2020, when COVID-19-related shutdowns led to a 2/3 reduction in the number of HIV tests administered in the state of West Virginia, the state identified 135 new HIV infections, of which 108 (80%) were directly related to IDU.

Since 2020, the state has struggled significantly with increasing provider buy-in for proactive HIV testing, leaving the bulk of HIV testing to be done in hospital emergency rooms during overdose events (using an opt-out delivery method that requires informed denial of testing) and by a mere handful of non-profit agencies and the state’s overworked, but extremely dedicated, Director of HIV Care and Prevention. This Director is one of the very few in the United States who regularly goes into communities to conduct testing events. His efforts are, however, hampered by inadequate levels of state and federal funding and increased scrutiny from a state legislature that continues to grow more hostile to HIV testing and prevention efforts.

According to the most recent report, West Virginia identified 140 new cases of HIV in 2022, of which 98 (70%) were directly attributed to IDU. 2023 is likely to be an equally devastating year, with 25 of the 48 cases identified to date (52.1%) being directly related to IDU.

The thinking behind utilizing LAIs as the first-line treatment option in PWIDs is that it has the potential to increase treatment adherence in a population that often faces numerous barriers to care and treatment, including a potential lack of stable housing, a lack of safe places to store daily HIV regimens, a potential inability to remain consistent with treatment regimens.

Prior Authorization requirements for drugs that treat infectious diseases already create arguably unnecessary barriers to treatment for patients. West Virginia’s blanket refusal to cover an FDA-approved and highly effective HIV treatment regimen for patients who are already adherent and virally suppressed serves as an unacceptable and unconscionable barrier to care in a state that is in desperate need of more convenient treatment options.

While Cabenuva, Sunlenca, and Trogarzo are still relatively new drugs, state Medicaid programs should be jumping at the opportunity to decrease treatment abandonment rates and increase easy treatment options for qualifying patients. We hope that more programs will abandon unnecessary restrictions upon this vital tool in the HIV treatment toolkit.

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.  

HIV/AIDS Patient Advocacy: 2023 Insights

By: Brandon M. Macsata, CEO, ADAP Advocacy Association

The New Year is here! Our patient advocacy work is likely to be influenced by numerous mitigating factors that fall completely outside of our control, most of which will make meaningful public health policy changes unlikely. A narrowly divided, partisan federal government, an indictment of a former president (pick a crime), an increase in anti-science rhetoric fueled by right-wing media and Internet-fueled conspiracies, and the ongoing economic uncertainty will all muddy the legislative agenda. But that is no reason to remain idle.

Photo Source: FreePik.com

The Covid-19 pandemic isn't over, especially here in the United States. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, as of December 22, 2022, over 400 people in this country are still perishing daily to this virus. Aside from the human toll of the cumulative effect of the infections, hospitalizations, and deaths, Covid-19 has upended public health in so many ways. Its impact on our own HIV community cannot be overstated, as we outlined last year. Covid-19 also further exposed the significant gaps that remain in our HIV care delivery system. It has also defined the shape of the broader public health advocacy over the last three years.

Lest we forget there are still nefarious forces at play trying to undermine our drug supply chain with counterfeit medicines, evidenced by numerous high-profile cases involving fake HIV medicines. With our partners, we will continue to advise patients on how to spot fake HIV medicines. It is imperative that patient advocates resist ongoing attempts to reshape the national dialogue on drug pricing with faux policies, such as drug importation. The reality is drug importation won't lower the cost of prescription drugs for patients, but it could very well weaken the world's safest drug supply system. Look no further than the drug importation plans in Florida and Colorado. 

Our focus will also remain on improving access to care and treatment, expanding it as much as possible while fending off threats to the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP). We fully anticipate another attempt by mega service providers and special interests to push for raiding RWHAP funding for PrEP-related rebates under the 340B Drug Pricing Program. Robbing Peter to pay Paul is never the solution, because the result is restricting access. We stand firm with people living with HIV/AIDS.

Long-acting agents for HIV therapy (LAAs) represents probably the single greatest opportunity to expand access, reduce community viral load, and further the U=U Gospel ("undetectable equals untransmittable"). The recent news by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to approve a new HIV drug for adults with limited treatment options is big news! It builds on the momentum already established with new LAAs, such as Cabenuva and Trogarzo. 

As the chaos continues to unfold in our nation's capitol, it is imperative for patient advocates to be armed with the resources and tools to influence public policy on HIV/AIDS. Our organization is eager to engage our community to meet any challenge head-on.

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.

Advocacy Needed to Reduce Barriers to Accessing Long-Acting Agent Therapies

By: Ranier Simons, ADAP Blog Guest Contributor

Medical science continues to advance at a rate that outpaces healthcare policy and subsequently healthcare practices. This is especially true regarding novel lifesaving therapies and modalities for chronic diseases such as HIV/AIDS. Treatment for people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) is expensive, long-term, and requires consistency in its administration to be effective. Moreover, antiretroviral medications and other related compounds are rapidly evolving. There have already been challenges to ensure equal access, for all, for established and widely used therapies. The situation is even more dire for some of the newest treatments available. That is why the ADAP Advocacy Association created its ADAP Injectables Advisory Committee. 

Photo Source: PRC

The advisory committee was a collaboration of patients, as well as representatives from pharmaceutical manufacturers, advocacy groups, healthcare providers, and pharmacy groups. In August 2022, the advisory committee released its report: HIV LONG-ACTING AGENTS: Policy Considerations for Injectable Therapies under the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program & State AIDS Drug Assistance Programs. It was in response to the need to reduce the operational burdens and other barriers of ensuring that PLWHA dependent upon the State AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) for their care receive equal access to newly developed injectable treatments in the same manner as people who are fully insured. The report also addressed barriers experienced under private insurance.

Long-acting agents include more than just antiretroviral therapies, such as Cabenuva, which is used to treat HIV. They also include treatments such as Apretude, an injectable used as PrEP, Egrifta used to reduce visceral abdominal fat as a result of lipodystrophy, Serostim for wasting, and Trogarzo which is intravenous therapy for those with multi-drug resistant HIV infections. 

These therapies are proven to be effective. However, not only are they expensive, but they are logistically challenging for supply and administration even for those who are fully insured. The challenge is even greater for those who utilize ADAP. The report described policy considerations to improve equity of care regarding injectables. Those considerations included discussions of how to reduce provider bias in offering injectable therapy as an option, ways to expand the network of facilities where injections and intravenous therapies can be administered for ADAP recipients, and ways to utilize community level resources for peer education and advocacy. 

Photo Source: Regional Center for Infectious Disease Research

A very important section of the report involved insurance. ADAP’s have formularies just in the same manner as insurance plans. Moreover, ADAP can use private insurance for patients for medication and can now assist with paying insurance premiums for low-income patients. The report discussed ways to navigate ADAP versus Medicaid insurance coverage for injectables. There was also policy discussion of how to maintain drug formularies to ensure consistent coverage.

HIV long acting agents are powerful tools in the fight against HIV and those utilizing ADAP deserve the same equity of care and access as those who are fully insured with more robust financial means. Whether it be geographical logistical challenges, treatment education deficiencies, supply chain issues, or even provider bias; ADAP recipients have many injection therapy barriers to overcome. The work of the ADAP Injectables Advisory Committee was to define necessary policy changes as well as guide discussions on how organizations can provide more ADAP recipient patient-centered care. Click here to read the report's cover letter, executive summary, and full report.

Disclaimer: Guest blogs do not necessarily reflect the views of the ADAP Advocacy Association, but rather they provide a neutral platform whereby the author serves to promote open, honest discussion about public health-related issues and updates.